Crypto Licensing Last updated:

Crypto Exchange License in Uzbekistan

Uzbekistan operates a codified four-licence crypto regime supervised by the National Agency for Prospective Projects (NAPP), the sole crypto-asset regulator. Founded on Presidential Resolution PP-3832 of , the framework covers crypto-exchanges, crypto-stores, crypto-depositories, and mining pools, with 0% tax on crypto operations confirmed until .

This guide covers NAPP’s licensing categories, capital and substance requirements, fees, timelines, taxation, banking access, and FATF standing for licensed providers serving a captive 660,000-client domestic market. An independent specialist introduced by Jagelski & Partners coordinates Uzbekistan crypto licensing end-to-end through its licensing partners.

Crypto Licence in Uzbekistan: Quick Overview
Licence TypeCrypto-Exchange / Crypto-Store / Crypto-Depository / Mining-Pool (activity-specific)
RegulatorNational Agency for Prospective Projects (NAPP)
Legal FrameworkPresidential Resolution PP-3832 (3 July 2018)
Timeline3–6 months
Statutory cost, Year 1USD 156,600 (mining-pool) to USD 3,067,800 (crypto-exchange): one-time state duty plus twelve monthly operational fees, at the BRV of UZS 440,000 in force since
Typical build, Year 1 (quoted per case)USD 72,500–253,000 by licence category
Min. Capital5,000 BRV for crypto-exchange, UZS 2.2bn (~USD 186,400) since ; not specified for other categories
Corporate Tax0% on crypto operations (confirmed until )
Local PresenceUzbek legal entity; servers in Uzbekistan; 5-year data retention[10]
EU PassportingNo
FATF StatusEAG member; not grey-listed; regular follow-up (2023)
Best ForOperators targeting Central Asia with captive-market positioning

Why Choose Uzbekistan for Crypto Licensing?

Uzbekistan offers a codified four-licence crypto regime with 0% tax on crypto operations until , supervised by the National Agency for Prospective Projects (NAPP) under Presidential Resolution PP-3832 of . The framework serves a captive 660,000-client domestic market protected by foreign-exchange access blocks, making it a regional Central Asia play rather than an EU-passporting route.[1]

In short: Uzbekistan is the right jurisdiction for operators serving Central Asian residents who want a codified regulatory perimeter, zero direct taxation on crypto activities, and a domestic market closed to foreign competitors. It is not the right choice for operators whose primary market is the EU, the UK, or any jurisdiction reachable through passporting.

A Codified Regulatory Perimeter Since 2018

Uzbekistan placed crypto-asset activities inside a formal legal perimeter in with PP-3832, well ahead of most emerging-market peers. The regime defines four discrete licence categories (crypto-exchange, crypto-store, crypto-depository, and mining-pool), each with its own fee schedule, monthly operational levy, and scope. Unlike Kazakhstan, whose established route is the Astana International Financial Centre’s bespoke jurisdiction (the National Bank has licensed crypto service providers outside it only since 1 May 2026), Uzbekistan applies its rules across the national territory through NAPP, a presidential agency with direct enforcement reach.[1][2]

0% Tax on Crypto Operations Until 1 January 2029

Operations of legal entities and individuals related to the turnover of crypto-assets are not subject to taxation, and the income received from these operations is not included in the taxable base under paragraph 2 of PP-3832 (as amended by Decree UP-140). The 0% regime covers corporate income tax, value-added tax, and capital-gains tax for licensed providers and their users.[1]

Compare this with Estonia, where MiCA-authorised CASPs pay the 22/78 distributed-profits CIT model, or Labuan, where trading companies that meet the substance test pay 3% on net audited profits and 24% otherwise.

A Captive 660,000-Client Domestic Market

From , Uzbek residents may purchase, sell, or exchange crypto-assets only through nationally licensed providers, with access to foreign exchanges blocked at the network level since .[3] Law ZRU-899 of made unlicensed crypto activity an administrative offence under Article 155⁴ of the Code on Administrative Responsibility and, after an administrative penalty, a crime under Criminal Code Article 278⁸, with up to five years’ imprisonment in the gravest cases; Article 278⁹ covers unlawful mining.[4]

As of , the 21 licensed providers serve 663,691 registered clients (661,850 residents) with USD 2 billion in 2025 turnover.[5][6]

PP-359 Stablecoin and Tokenisation Expansion

Presidential Resolution PP-359 of introduced from a regulatory sandbox for stablecoins as a means of payment, on terms NAPP sets with the Central Bank, and from the same date allowed Uzbek legal entities to issue tokenised shares and bonds for trading on a separate platform of licensed stock exchanges under a NAPP procedure. It also approved the Central Bank’s plan to introduce open banking by and set a 2026–2030 target of USD 1 billion of foreign investment in fintech start-ups.[7]

Operators positioning for stablecoin payments should engage NAPP and the Central Bank of the Republic of Uzbekistan (CBU) directly, because the resolution leaves the sandbox’s procedure and duration to the two regulators.[7]

Regulatory Framework

The crypto regulatory framework rests on Presidential Resolution PP-3832 “On measures to develop the digital economy and crypto-assets turnover sphere” of ,[1] elaborated through Ministry of Justice registrations 3380 (licensing procedure), 3379 (exchange trading rules), 3388 (fees), 3395 (crypto-store rules), 3409 (sandbox), 3461 (mining permits), 3507 (mining-pool rules), and 3584 (updated fee schedule, registered ).[8]

NAPP is the sole crypto regulator; the Central Bank of the Republic of Uzbekistan (CBU) is the AML/CFT umbrella supervisor but not a co-equal crypto authority.

In short: NAPP is the single point of regulatory contact for crypto licensing in Uzbekistan, holding statutory authority under PP-3832, DP-121, and the implementing Ministry of Justice registrations. CBU supervises AML/CFT compliance across the financial sector but does not issue crypto licences.

Definition: Crypto Licence in Uzbekistan

A crypto licence in Uzbekistan is one of four activity-specific authorisations issued by NAPP (crypto-exchange, crypto-store, crypto-depository, or mining-pool) under Ministry of Justice registration 3380 of . Licences are issued for an unlimited period to Uzbek-registered legal entities. The licensing perimeter is set by PP-3832 and its successor decrees; the General Prosecutor’s Office Department for Combating Economic Crimes is the financial intelligence unit.

Regulatory History

Uzbekistan’s crypto regime has evolved through four phases. Phase one () introduced PP-3832 and PP-3926, establishing crypto-asset property rights and the original crypto-exchange concept under the predecessor agency, the National Agency for Project Management (NAPM). Phase two () added Ministry of Justice registration 3309, the AML/CFT internal-control rulebook for crypto service providers.[9]

Phase three () restructured NAPM into NAPP via Presidential Decree DP-121, established the Special Regulatory Sandbox, and rolled out the operative Ministry of Justice registrations 3380, 3379, 3388, 3395, and 3409 between August and December 2022.[10]

Phase four (–) added criminal enforcement through Law ZRU-899, updated state-duty schedules through NAPP Order No. 100 of , and, through PP-359, a stablecoin-payments sandbox and tokenised share and bond issuance from January 2026.[4][7]

Recent Regulatory Developments

  • · Presidential Resolution PP-359 introduces a stablecoin-payments sandbox and tokenised share and bond issuance from ; open-banking deadline .[7]
  • · Presidential Decree DP-180 + NAPP Order No. 82 publishes list of crypto-exchanges authorised for the special tax regime for foreign citizens.[11]
  • · Presidential Decree UP-91 raises the Base Calculation Value (BRV) to UZS 412,000, and UP-115 of raises it again to UZS 440,000 from . Every licence cost and the charter-capital floor are set in BRV multiples, so all of them rise without the licensing rule changing a word.[12]
  • · Ministry of Justice registration 3584 (NAPP Order No. 100): updated state-duty schedule lifting crypto-store one-off fee to 3,700 BRV and mining-pool fee to 3,000 BRV.[8]
  • · Ministry of Justice registration 3507: Mining-Pool Operating Rules.[13]
  • · Law ZRU-899 introduces criminal and administrative penalties for unlicensed crypto activity; up to five years’ imprisonment under Criminal Code Article 278⁸.[4]
  • · Ministry of Justice registration 3461: Mining Permits Procedure.[14]
  • : Residents-must-use-licensed-CASPs rule from PP-3832 enters force.[1]

Regulatory Overlap

Three regimes overlap with NAPP’s crypto perimeter. AML/CFT obligations under Law No. 660-II of apply to all crypto service providers alongside banks and securities professionals, supervised through the CBU and the General Prosecutor’s Office FIU.[15] Currency-regulation rules administered by the CBU apply to fiat legs of crypto transactions, though licensed CASPs benefit from a PP-3832 exemption for crypto-related conversions.

Tax administration sits with the State Tax Committee, which applies the exemption in paragraph 2 of PP-3832 (as amended by Decree UP-140) while monitoring compliance for the 1 January 2029 sunset.

License Types and Activities Covered

NAPP issues four discrete activity-specific licences under Ministry of Justice registration 3380. Each authorises a defined scope of activities, carries its own state duty, monthly operational fee, and substance requirements, and is issued for an unlimited period. There is no umbrella VASP or CASP licence covering multiple activities; operators wanting to combine activities must obtain each licence separately.

In short: Pick the licence by activity, not by the operator profile. A combined exchange-and-custody business needs both a crypto-exchange licence and a crypto-depository licence, with separate state duties and monthly fees for each.

Covered Activities

  • Crypto-Exchange Licence. Operating an electronic platform for the purchase, sale, and exchange of crypto-assets with order-book matching, serving both legal entities and individuals. Highest-cost category. Three operators licensed as of .[5]
  • Crypto-Store Licence. Operating a platform for the purchase and sale of crypto-assets brokered to individuals, online and offline including physical points accepting bank cards and cash. Twelve operators licensed as of .[5]
  • Crypto-Depository Licence. Operating a platform for the issuance, initial placement, and storage of crypto-assets, equivalent to a custodian and registrar function. Six operators licensed as of .[5]
  • Mining-Pool Licence. Operating a platform for the consolidation of computing power for crypto mining. Mining itself follows a separate NAPP registration and permit procedure, rather than this service-provider licence.[29]

What Does NOT Require a NAPP Licence

  • Mining as an activity. Legal entities need NAPP registration and a mining permit. Solar photovoltaic electricity is required outside the Besqala Mining Valley special zone; it is not merely preferred. Hidden mining and anonymous-coin mining are prohibited.[1][29]
  • Besqala Mining Valley. PP-143 of 17 April 2026 permits grid, renewable and hydrogen-generated electricity for approved zone residents registered in Karakalpakstan. Residents need a NAPP mining permit and pay the Directorate 1% of mining income monthly; the resolution exempts that income from taxes and fees until 1 January 2035.[30]
  • Grid electricity. Mining normally attracts a double tariff, separate metering and peak-period surcharges. The double-tariff rule expressly excepts cases under Annex 1 to UP-189 of 22 October 2025; confirm eligibility before budgeting an exemption.[1][30]
  • NFT activities on foreign platforms. Resident NFT sales on foreign platforms remain permitted as the sole carve-out from the resident-uses-domestic-CASPs rule.[3]
  • Pure technology services. Software development, blockchain analytics, wallet infrastructure not engaged in regulated activities falls outside the perimeter and may pursue IT Park residency instead.

Activity Restrictions

Regulation 3397 (Ministry of Justice registration of ) prohibits resident issuance and depository registration of currency-pegged stable tokens and unsecured tokens, subject to its utility-token exceptions; it permits eligible secured tokens and access, ticket, voucher, and governance utility tokens under its issuance and registration procedures. From , PP-359 opens a sandbox for stablecoins as a means of payment, on terms NAPP sets with the Central Bank, and lets Uzbek legal entities issue tokenised shares and bonds under a NAPP procedure.[7]

Regulatory Sandbox

The Special Regulation Regime in Crypto-Assets Circulation under Decree DP-121 and Ministry of Justice registration 3409 permits pilots without a full licence, with tax exemptions, exemption from customs payments other than customs clearance fees for approved imports of qualifying equipment, components and software not produced in Uzbekistan, imported for the participant’s own needs, and a fixed 7.5% personal income tax on sandbox-employee wages. The first three participants registered in 2023 were Uzinfocom (NFT for “.uz” domains and Token.uz on Ethereum and Arbitrum), Kapitalbank, and Octobank (bank-card pilots “Crypto Card” and “CRYPTO CARD-UzNEX”).[26] PP-359 adds a separate sandbox for stablecoin payments from .[7][10]

Requirements

NAPP licensing requires an Uzbek-registered legal entity with paid-up charter capital, fit-and-proper founders and managers, a registered local office, and platform infrastructure physically located in Uzbekistan with five-year data retention. Crypto-exchange applicants face the most demanding capital threshold; other categories carry no numerical charter-capital floor on the NAPP licensing page.

In short: The two most common make-or-break elements are the 3,000 BRV reservation in a separate Uzbek commercial-bank account at the date of crypto-exchange application, and the prohibition on offshore-company shareholders. Both invalidate applications irrespective of how strong the rest of the dossier is.
RequirementStandardCrypto-Exchange Specifics
Legal EntityUzbek-registered legal entity (typically LLC / MChJ)Same
Min. DirectorsNot specified in primary source; in practice one resident managerSame
Foreign OwnershipPermitted; offshore-registered companies prohibited as shareholdersSame
Charter CapitalNot numerically specified for crypto-store / crypto-depository / mining-pool on NAPP page5,000 BRV paid-up (UZS 2.2bn, ~USD 186,400), of which 3,000 BRV (UZS 1.32bn, ~USD 111,900) reserved in a separate Uzbek commercial-bank account at the date of application
OfficeRegistered office in UzbekistanSame
ServersPhysical location in Uzbekistan; 5-year data retentionSame
Fit-and-ProperNo unspent convictions for economic, corruption, or information crimes among founders and managersSame
Local Senior StaffExpected in practice; no explicit citizenship ruleSame
Name RestrictionsNo use of “state”, “government”, “national”, “Uzbekistan”, or Republic-city names in any languageSame
TechnicalFull KYC, transaction monitoring, FIU reporting; AML/CFT framework under Ministry of Justice registration 3309Same

Fit-and-Proper Assessment

NAPP assesses founders, beneficial owners, the head of the entity, and the head’s deputies. The principal disqualifying conditions are unspent convictions for economic crimes, corruption offences, and information crimes. The second disqualifying condition operates at the shareholder level: companies incorporated in offshore jurisdictions are barred from holding shares in a licensed CASP, irrespective of beneficial ownership transparency. Operators planning to capitalise through an offshore holding vehicle should restructure before filing, since the NAPP review will identify and reject the structure.

Local Presence / Local Representation

A licensed CASP must operate as a registered Uzbek legal entity, with a registered office in Uzbekistan and platform infrastructure on servers physically located in Uzbekistan. Transaction and client data must be retained for five years and made available to state authorities on lawful request. The local-entity requirement applies uniformly across all four licence categories; there is no representative-office or branch route available to foreign operators.

AML/CFT and Travel Rule

AML/CFT obligations sit under Law No. 660-II of , elaborated for CASPs through Ministry of Justice registration 3309 of , the Internal Control Rules for Crypto Service Providers.[9][15] The framework aligns with FATF Recommendation 15 (VASPs) and Recommendation 16 (Travel Rule). Customer identification and verification is mandatory for all clients; transaction monitoring and suspicious-transaction reports flow to the Department for Combating Economic Crimes within the General Prosecutor’s Office, which is the financial intelligence unit. The EAG’s 2022 Mutual Evaluation Report rated Uzbekistan Largely Compliant on Recommendation 15.[16]

Application Process

NAPP applications take 3–6 months end-to-end from entity formation to licence issuance. There is no application fee; state duty is payable on issuance only. Applications are filed directly with NAPP at info@napp.uz, by post, or in person at Nukus street 22, Mirabad district, Tashkent. The application language is Uzbek; supporting documents in other languages require notarised translations.

In short: Most applicants underestimate the bank-reservation stage. The 3,000 BRV reserved in a separate Uzbek commercial-bank account must be in place at the date of application, not in the 30 days after, and credit-funded capital is rejected.

Pre-Application Engagement

NAPP does not operate a formal pre-application or innovation hub for the full licensing route, but the Ministry of Justice registration 3409 sandbox is available for pilots that need to validate the model before committing to full licensing. Direct engagement with NAPP via email or in-person consultation is the norm for clarifying scope ahead of dossier preparation.

Stage 1 1–3 business days

Entity Formation

Forming an Uzbekistan entity is the first step. State registration of a limited-liability company (MChJ) takes 1–3 business days at a state duty of 1 BRV, UZS 440,000 (about USD 37), the same for a company with foreign founders, or 90% of that when filed online through my.gov.uz.[25] The entity must be incorporated locally before any NAPP submission.

Stage 2 4–8 weeks

Dossier Preparation

Compile the full reg. 3380 dossier: corporate constitutional documents, KYC files for founders and managers, AML manual aligned with Ministry of Justice registration 3309, business plan and financial projections, IT architecture documentation, and proof of server location in Uzbekistan. Engaging local counsel familiar with NAPP review patterns shortens this stage materially.

Stage 3 2–4 weeks

Charter Capital Deployment and Bank Reservation

For a crypto-exchange application, deposit 5,000 BRV (about UZS 2.2 billion, USD 186,400) of paid-up charter capital and reserve 3,000 BRV (about UZS 1.32 billion, USD 111,900) in a separate Uzbek commercial-bank account in the entity’s name. The reservation must be in place at the date of submission. Other licence categories have no numerical capital floor on the NAPP page; verify with local counsel.

Stage 4 1–3 months

NAPP Review

NAPP must decide on issuing or refusing the licence within 20 working days of the application;[10] the 1–3 months allowed here covers requests for supplementary documentation. The agency is statutorily prohibited from requiring documents beyond those listed in reg. 3380, which limits the surface area for delays where the initial dossier is complete. Incomplete dossiers are routinely returned and reset the review clock.

Stage 5 1–2 weeks

State-Duty Payment and Licence Issuance

Pay the one-time state duty per the December 2024 fee schedule (see Section 7) and receive the licence. The licence is issued for an unlimited period; there is no fixed renewal cycle, though the monthly operational fee is payable in advance by the 10th of each month from the issuance date.

An independent specialist introduced by Jagelski & Partners coordinates the full NAPP application end-to-end through its licensing partners: entity formation, charter-capital reservation, dossier compilation aligned with Ministry of Justice registration 3380, AML manual drafting per registration 3309, and post-issuance compliance support. The compliance documentation package and IT-substance review are the two stages where independent specialist support most reliably shortens the timeline.

Required Documents

Crypto-licence applications under Ministry of Justice registration 3380 require a defined dossier of corporate, governance, technical, and AML/CFT documents. NAPP cannot lawfully require documents beyond those enumerated in the registration, which gives well-prepared applicants a predictable review surface.

DocumentPurpose
Corporate constitutional documents (charter, certificate of incorporation, register of members)Establishes the Uzbek legal entity
Founder information traced through to each ultimate beneficial ownerNAPP licensing disclosure under registration 3380, paragraph 14(b); no percentage ownership cut-off[10]
KYC files for founders, head, and deputies (passport, no-conviction certificates, CV)Fit-and-proper at the natural-person level
Confirmation of charter-capital depositCapital adequacy (crypto-exchange)
Bank confirmation of 3,000 BRV reserved accountCapital adequacy (crypto-exchange)
Business plan (services, target customers, revenue projection, capital adequacy)Commercial substance review
AML/CFT internal control rules per Ministry of Justice registration 3309AML/CFT compliance
IT architecture documentation (system diagrams, security framework, server location proof)Technical substance review
Data-retention plan (5-year retention; state-authority access framework)Operational compliance
Proof of registered office in UzbekistanLocal presence
Proof of payment of state duty (on issuance)Fee compliance
Notarised translations into Uzbek for foreign-language documentsProcedural

Compliance Documentation Drafting

An independent specialist introduced by Jagelski & Partners coordinates the drafting and assembly of the full reg. 3380 documentation pack through its licensing partners, sequencing the AML manual aligned with Ministry of Justice registration 3309, the IT-architecture and server-location proof, business plan, and fit-and-proper files so the dossier opens with a complete record. Drafting Uzbek-specific procedures referencing the operative Ministry of Justice registrations by number, rather than adapting a generic template, is the most reliable predictor of a clean NAPP review.

Costs and Pricing

Crypto licence costs in Uzbekistan are anchored on two figures: a one-time state duty payable on issuance, set by Ministry of Justice registration 3584 of (NAPP Order No. 100 of ), and a monthly operational fee payable in advance from the licence-issuance date, set by registration 3388.[8][10]

Both are set in an indexed unit, the Base Calculation Value (BRV), so the rule never changes while the money does. The BRV has been UZS 440,000 since under Presidential Decree UP-115 of , up from UZS 412,000 under Presidential Decree UP-91 of , and both the duty and the fee are charged at the BRV in force on the payment date.[8][10][12]

Dollar figures below convert at the Central Bank of Uzbekistan official rate of UZS 11,801.23 to the dollar on , and every one of them moves with both the unit and the rate.[12]

In short: For most operators, the realistic licence to target is the crypto-store at about USD 138,000 one-time plus USD 6,900 per month, or the mining-pool at about USD 111,900 one-time plus USD 3,730 per month. The crypto-exchange licence at about USD 2.74 million one-time plus USD 27,600 per month is competitive only for operators with serious turnover ambitions. All four figures reflect the Base Calculation Value of UZS 440,000 in force since .

Government / NAPP Fees

LicenceOne-time state dutyMonthly operational fee
Crypto-Exchange≈ USD 2,736,70073,400 BRV · UZS 32,296,000,000≈ USD 27,600740 BRV · UZS 325,600,000
Crypto-Depository≈ USD 261,0007,000 BRV · UZS 3,080,000,000≈ USD 1865 BRV · UZS 2,200,000
Crypto-Store≈ USD 138,0003,700 BRV · UZS 1,628,000,000≈ USD 6,900185 BRV · UZS 81,400,000
Mining-Pool≈ USD 111,9003,000 BRV · UZS 1,320,000,000≈ USD 3,730100 BRV · UZS 44,000,000

State duty is distributed 80% to the State Budget and 20% to NAPP. The fee was last updated in the December 2024 NAPP Order No. 100 (crypto-store raised from 2,600 BRV; mining-pool raised from 1,900 BRV).

Both the rate and the Base Calculation Value move, so reconfirm at application: the unit is the law and the dollar figure is only a conversion of it.

Statutory Cost: NAPP and State Charges

ChargeCrypto-ExchangeCrypto-StoreCrypto-DepositoryMining-Pool
One-time state duty~USD 2,736,700~USD 138,000~USD 261,000~USD 111,900
Monthly operational fee × 12~USD 331,100~USD 82,800~USD 2,200~USD 44,700
Statutory cost, Year 1~USD 3,067,800~USD 220,800~USD 263,200~USD 156,600

The monthly operational fee continues for the life of the licence, so the statutory cost from Year 2 onwards is the twelve-month figure alone: about USD 331,100 for a crypto-exchange, USD 82,800 for a crypto-store, USD 2,200 for a crypto-depository and USD 44,700 for a mining-pool. Charter capital for a crypto-exchange is 5,000 BRV, about USD 186,400, of which 3,000 BRV must be reserved in an Uzbek commercial-bank account at the date of application; it is deployed rather than spent, so it belongs in neither figure. The 0% tax on crypto operations under paragraph 2 of PP-3832 (as amended by Decree UP-140), which runs until , is a charge on income rather than a licensing fee and likewise belongs in neither.

Typical Build, Quoted Per Case

Cost LineCrypto-ExchangeCrypto-StoreCrypto-DepositoryMining-Pool
Entity formation + corporate services~USD 1,500–3,000~USD 1,500–3,000~USD 1,500–3,000~USD 1,500–3,000
Legal advisory (dossier, AML manual)~USD 35,000–60,000~USD 25,000–45,000~USD 30,000–50,000~USD 25,000–40,000
Compliance documentation (AML manual, risk assessment, sanctions framework, Travel Rule SOPs)~USD 15,000–25,000~USD 15,000–25,000~USD 15,000–25,000~USD 15,000–25,000
IT setup (servers in Uzbekistan, 5-yr retention infrastructure)~USD 80,000–150,000~USD 25,000–60,000~USD 40,000–80,000~USD 30,000–60,000
Local representative / office (Year 1)~USD 8,000–15,000~USD 6,000–12,000~USD 6,000–12,000~USD 6,000–12,000
Typical build, Year 1 (quoted per case)~USD 139,500–253,000~USD 72,500–145,000~USD 92,500–170,000~USD 77,500–140,000

Statutory cost and build together put a first year at roughly USD 3,207,300 to 3,320,800 for a crypto-exchange, USD 293,300 to 365,800 for a crypto-store, USD 355,700 to 433,200 for a crypto-depository and USD 234,100 to 296,600 for a mining-pool.

From Year 2 the recurring build runs about USD 62,000 to 122,000 (crypto-exchange), USD 26,000 to 51,000 (crypto-store), USD 18,300 to 33,300 (crypto-depository) and USD 20,000 to 40,000 (mining-pool), on top of the monthly fee.

[ Scope ] The statutory figure is what the regulator and the state charge, from published schedules. The build figure is an indicative planning estimate that varies by specialist, scope and client profile, not a quotation: the partner who carries the mandate prices consultation, the application file, the compliance build and the ongoing programme per case, because every case differs. Jagelski & Partners charges the client nothing. Both figures exclude regulatory capital, which is held rather than spent.

Licences are issued for an unlimited period; there is no fixed annual renewal fee, but the monthly operational fee continues for the life of the licence. Charter-capital figures for crypto-store, crypto-depository, and mining-pool are not numerically specified on the NAPP licensing page; some consultancies cite a 300,000 dollar minimum, but this cannot be confirmed against NAPP, so verify with local counsel before relying on it.

Timeline

NAPP licensing takes 3–6 months end-to-end. The realistic distribution across the five application stages is shown below, with the bank-reservation and NAPP-review stages typically the longest variable.

StageDurationCumulative
Entity formation (MChJ registration)1–3 business daysWeek 1
Dossier preparation4–8 weeksWeek 2–10
Charter-capital deployment + bank reservation2–4 weeksWeek 10–14
NAPP review4–13 weeksWeek 14–27
State-duty payment + licence issuance1–2 weeksWeek 27–29
Total3–6 monthsWeek 12–29

NAPP processed 21 licences cumulatively between 2022 and , an average of roughly one licence every two months, split across the crypto-exchange, crypto-store, and crypto-depository categories.[5] Crypto-exchange reviews tend to run longer than crypto-store reviews because the capital-reservation and technical-substance documentation is more demanding.

Taxation

Uzbekistan is a zero-tax jurisdiction for crypto activities of licensed CASPs and their users until , anchored in paragraph 2 of PP-3832 (as amended by Decree UP-140).[1] Uzbekistan has not enacted domestic Pillar Two legislation; the OECD Global Minimum Tax applies only to multinational groups with consolidated annual revenue of EUR 750 million or more in at least two of the four preceding fiscal years[28], a threshold unlikely to affect standalone Uzbekistan-domiciled CASPs.

TaxRateCrypto Application
Corporate Income Tax15% standard0% on crypto operations of licensed CASPs (PP-3832, paragraph 2, as amended by Decree UP-140) until
Capital Gains TaxNone on cryptoCrypto disposals not taxable for individuals or licensed CASPs
Value-Added Tax12% standard0% on crypto trades and CASP operations
Withholding Tax10% (dividends and interest to non-residents; 5% to residents); 20% (royalties to non-residents)Standard rates apply to non-crypto income flows
Payroll Tax12% PIT standard7.5% PIT for sandbox-resident employees
Stamp DutyNone on crypto operationsNot applicable

The IT Park Uzbekistan Special Regime

IT Park Uzbekistan offers a parallel zero-tax regime extended to for technology businesses: 0% corporate income tax, 0% VAT, 0% social tax, 7.5% personal income tax for resident employees, 5% dividend tax for non-resident founders, and customs-duty exemption on imported equipment until .[17] Crypto-exchange and CASP activity is not on IT Park’s permitted core-activity list, so the licensed CASP entity sits outside IT Park under NAPP’s 0% crypto regime; the technology arm of a crypto group may reside in IT Park and complement (not overlap with) the CASP entity. Operators should confirm direct CASP eligibility with both NAPP and IT Park; the relationship is not crystal-clear in primary sources.

CRS/CARF Reporting

Uzbekistan has not committed to the OECD Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF): it is in none of the 2027, 2028 or 2029 exchange cohorts on the Global Forum list last updated on , and it is not yet exchanging under the Common Reporting Standard (CRS).[23] No CARF reporting date therefore applies to licensed CASPs today; treat automatic exchange as a forward risk and track announcements from NAPP and the Ministry of Economy and Finance.

Tax-Regime Sunset Risk

The exemption is time-limited. Presidential Decree UP-140 of inserted a end date into PP-3832, and the consolidated text (edition of ) still carries it.[21] Any change would come through a new legal act. Operators should allow for taxed operations from 2029 in financial models, even though the headline figure today is 0%.

Ongoing Compliance & Post-Registration

A NAPP licence creates a permanent compliance infrastructure obligation: monthly fee payments, annual reporting, AML/CFT monitoring, transaction reporting to the FIU, and a five-year data retention obligation. Licensees are subject to NAPP supervisory inspections and to administrative and criminal penalties for compliance breaches under Law ZRU-899.

In short: Annual recurring cost for a crypto-store licence runs ~USD 108,800–133,800 once the twelve monthly fees and the recurring build (local presence, audit and compliance support) are included. For a crypto-exchange, the ongoing figure is ~USD 393,100–453,100. Plan for these figures, not just the one-time state duty.

The compliance documentation pack required by NAPP includes the AML manual aligned with Ministry of Justice registration 3309, a risk assessment, a sanctions-screening framework, Travel Rule SOPs, and the annual review cycle that ties them to current FATF guidance and EAG-MER findings. Specialist support maintains this pack against successive regulatory updates.

Annual Reporting Obligations

Licensed CASPs file audited financial statements annually with the State Tax Committee and NAPP, with deadlines aligned to the standard Uzbek corporate financial year. The compliance officer files internal AML/CFT reports and threshold transaction reports to the General Prosecutor’s Office FIU on a rolling basis. Annual transaction-volume reporting to NAPP is required for the agency’s published statistics (cumulative client count, turnover, jobs created).

Renewal Fees / Supervision Fees

The NAPP licence is issued for an unlimited period; there is no renewal cycle. The monthly operational fee under Ministry of Justice registration 3388 of 28 September 2022 is payable in advance by the 10th of each month,[10] and runs for the life of the licence: 740 BRV for crypto-exchange, 185 BRV for crypto-store, 100 BRV for mining-pool, and 5 BRV for crypto-depository.

Recurring costs additional to NAPP fees are accounting and audit, a local representative or office, and compliance support; depending on transaction volume they run about USD 18,300–33,300 a year for a crypto-depository, USD 20,000–40,000 for a mining-pool, USD 26,000–51,000 for a crypto-store and USD 62,000–122,000 for a crypto-exchange.

Regulatory Inspections

NAPP conducts scheduled supervisory inspections and is empowered to conduct unannounced inspections where it has reason to believe the licensee is in breach of Ministry of Justice registration 3380 or related instruments. Thematic reviews in 2024–2025 focused on Travel Rule implementation, server-localisation compliance, and KYC documentation. NAPP requested blocking of over 3,000 online resources in 2025 and fined three to four foreign crypto platforms (identities not publicly disclosed).[5]

Enforcement

Operating a crypto-related business without the appropriate NAPP licence carries administrative and criminal liability under Law ZRU-899. A first offence falls under Article 155⁴ of the Code on Administrative Responsibility: arrest of up to 15 days or a fine of 20 to 30 BRV, with confiscation of the crypto-assets. After an administrative penalty, Criminal Code Article 278⁸ applies: a fine of up to 100 BRV or up to one year’s imprisonment, up to three years for repeat, large-scale or group offences, and three to five years for especially large-scale offences, abuse of office or an organised group; Article 278⁹ covers unlawful mining.[4] NAPP fined Binance UZS 99 million (~USD 7,300) in for unauthorised provision of services to Uzbek residents; Binance subsequently entered the market through a licensed local partner in .[3][18]

Advertising and Promotion Rules

Licensed CASPs must include risk warnings in promotional material; advertising cannot guarantee returns or present crypto as a quick-wealth route. NAPP exercises supervisory authority over CASP advertising practice as part of its general supervisory mandate. Specific penalty amounts for advertising breaches are administered under the Code on Administrative Responsibility.

Banking

Banking access for Uzbekistan-licensed CASPs is structurally different from EU or offshore-licensed counterparts: licensed CASPs operate within a domestic banking system supervised by the CBU, with the UZS as the principal settlement currency. PP-3832 Article 3 exempts licensed CASPs from currency-regulation norms for crypto-related conversions, which materially eases multi-currency operational flow inside Uzbekistan.

Jagelski & Partners’ banking network supports Uzbekistan-licensed CASPs with pre-qualified onboarding routes across Uzbek commercial banks and Central Asian correspondent partners. The written scope aligns the proposed banking timeline with the NAPP application cycle; an independent specialist introduced by Jagelski & Partners coordinates delivery. Open a corporate banking pathway for your Uzbekistan-licensed entity →

The Local Banking Landscape

The Uzbek commercial banking sector is the primary settlement venue for licensed CASPs, with multiple banks now offering crypto-business accounts. Sandbox commercial banks have launched specialised products, such as crypto-linked cards issued under the Ministry of Justice registration 3409 sandbox.[10] The CBU has progressively relaxed bank engagement with the regulated crypto sector while maintaining tight prudential oversight.

Cross-Border Settlement

Uzbekistan is not on the FATF grey or black list, which materially eases correspondent banking relationships compared with higher-risk jurisdictions. Cross-border USD settlement for licensed CASPs is feasible through tier-2 Central Asian and selected Western correspondent banks, with documentary requirements proportionate to a clean-status jurisdiction. UZS has depreciated steadily against USD since the 2017 currency liberalisation; charter-capital buffers should be sized with this trend in mind.

Open Banking from September 2026

Presidential Resolution PP-359 approved the Central Bank’s plan to introduce open banking by : secure, standardised data exchange between banks, payment organisations and fintech market participants.[7] The resolution does not say how licensed CASPs connect to it, so confirm access with the Central Bank.

Jagelski & Partners Banking Partner Network
90+Institutions
€14bnPlaced via the network in 2025
Pre-qualifiedBefore submission

For an Uzbekistan-licensed CASP the architecture is domestic-first: UZS settlement through CBU-supervised commercial banks, Central Asian correspondent partners for regional flows, and tier-2 Western correspondents for USD legs, aligned with the NAPP application cycle. Jagelski & Partners scopes banking options in writing and introduces an independent specialist before a licence application is filed. You contract directly with the specialist; account approval remains the financial institution's decision.

Explore Banking Solutions →

FATF Status & International Standing

Uzbekistan is a member of the Eurasian Group on Combating Money Laundering and Financing of Terrorism (EAG), a FATF-style regional body, and is not on the FATF grey or black list in the FATF statements of . The country sits in the EAG regular follow-up category, having moved from enhanced follow-up in 2023, and its 2nd regular follow-up report was published in 2026.[24]

In short: Uzbekistan is a mid-tier EAG / FATF jurisdiction with no listing-based reputational red flags. It compares favourably with Kyrgyzstan, which remains in EAG enhanced follow-up, and is comparable to Kazakhstan, which is also in EAG regular follow-up.

2022 Mutual Evaluation Report

The EAG conducted an on-site visit from to ; the MER was adopted in 2022.[16] Uzbekistan was rated Compliant or Largely Compliant on most FATF Recommendations, including a Largely Compliant rating on Recommendation 15 (Virtual Asset Service Providers).

2023 First Enhanced Follow-Up Report

The 2023 First Enhanced Follow-Up Report upgraded ratings on Recommendations 6, 7, and 22 from Partially Compliant to Largely Compliant, and transferred Uzbekistan from enhanced to regular follow-up.[19] Regular follow-up is the lower-frequency, less-intrusive supervisory category; transfers from enhanced to regular signal sustained improvement and reduce the reputational drag on cross-border banking.

No EU Passporting

In short: An Uzbekistan crypto licence does not grant access to the EU market. Operators serving EU clients must either obtain a separate CASP authorisation in an EU member state or fall within the narrow reverse solicitation exemption under MiCA Article 61, which covers only services provided at the client’s own exclusive initiative; ESMA’s February 2025 guidelines construe that initiative narrowly.[27]

Uzbekistan is a non-EU, non-EEA third country, and there is no equivalence or recognition regime for third-country crypto licences under MiCA (Regulation (EU) 2023/1114). For a detailed analysis of what constitutes solicitation and the documentation requirements under the third-country exemption, see Reverse Solicitation Under MiCA →.

Advantages and Limitations

Uzbekistan offers a codified four-licence regime, a 0% tax window until 1 January 2029, and a captive 660,000-client domestic market, but operators trade EU passporting, reputational tier, and certain entry-cost economics for those advantages. Every limitation below carries a mitigation strategy.

  • ✓ 0% tax on crypto operations until 1 January 2029. No corporate income tax, no VAT, no capital-gains tax, anchored in paragraph 2 of PP-3832 (as amended by Decree UP-140).
  • ✓ Codified four-licence taxonomy. Uzbekistan placed crypto in a formal legal perimeter from the outset, not legalised retroactively.
  • ✓ Captive 660,000-client domestic market. Foreign exchanges blocked since August 2022; resident trading outside licensed channels is an administrative offence, and a criminal one after an administrative penalty.
  • ✓ Not on FATF grey or black list. EAG regular follow-up since 2023; Largely Compliant on R.15 (VASPs).
  • ✓ Strong government strategic backing. Digital Uzbekistan 2030; PP-359 (November 2025) materially expands the perimeter; NAPP reports directly to the President.
  • ✓ Reasonable cost for crypto-store and mining-pool licences. USD 234,100–365,800 total Year 1 range is competitive with mid-tier European regimes.
  • ✓ Active regulatory sandbox. No-licence pilot route with tax preferences; a separate PP-359 stablecoin-payments sandbox from January 2026.
  • × No EU passporting. An Uzbekistan licence does not grant EU market access. Mitigation: Operators targeting EU clients can obtain a separate CASP authorisation in an EU member state (full market access via passporting) or, for services provided at the client’s own exclusive initiative only, may fall within the narrow reverse solicitation exemption under MiCA Article 61.
  • × Crypto-exchange entry cost is extraordinarily high. USD ~2.74 million one-time state duty plus USD ~27,600/month, far above the other three categories. Mitigation: Target the crypto-store or mining-pool category if the business model permits; both have realistic Year 1 totals under about USD 366,000.
  • × Reputational tier is emerging-market. Less prestigious than EU MiCA or Singapore MAS. Mitigation: Position the entity as a regional Central Asia operator; pair the Uzbekistan licence with an EU CASP authorisation if reputational signalling matters for the customer base.
  • × Local-presence burden. Mandatory Uzbek LLC, servers in Uzbekistan, 5-year data retention, name restrictions. Mitigation: Plan IT architecture for Uzbek hosting from day one; budget USD 25,000–150,000 for substance setup depending on category.
  • × Tax-regime sunset risk. The 0% regime is confirmed only until 1 January 2029. Mitigation: Build forward financial models that allow for taxed operations from 2029 onwards, and re-check the consolidated text of PP-3832 before relying on the exemption.
  • × Restrictive token taxonomy outside the sandbox. Residents barred from issuing Stable Tokens or Unsecured Tokens outside the PP-359 sandbox. Mitigation: For stablecoin payments, engage NAPP and the Central Bank early about the PP-359 sandbox; tokenised shares and bonds follow a separate NAPP procedure on licensed stock exchanges.
  • × Criminal exposure for non-compliance. Law ZRU-899 carries up to 5 years’ imprisonment. Mitigation: Operate strictly inside the licensed perimeter; do not market to Uzbek residents from a foreign entity.

How Uzbekistan Compares

Uzbekistan competes for Central Asia operator flow against Kazakhstan (AIFC bespoke regime), Kyrgyzstan (recently established crypto framework), and Labuan (Malaysian APAC alternative at lower cost). Estonia is the natural cross-tier reference for operators considering an EU upgrade.

FactorUzbekistanKazakhstan (AIFC)KyrgyzstanLabuan (Malaysia)
Licence TypeCrypto-Exchange / Store / Depository / Mining-Pool (NAPP)Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility (AFSA)VASP licence (Exchange / Trading Operator)Digital Asset Exchange / Credit Token (Labuan FSA)
RegulatorNAPPAFSA within AIFCNAVA (licensing); Financial Market Regulatory and Supervisory Service (supervision)Labuan FSA
Timeline3–6 months6–12 months8–16 weeks4–6 months
Min. Capital5,000 BRV (~USD 186,400) for crypto-exchangeHigher of USD 200,000 or 12 months’ working capitalAVA exchange operator: KGS 40m (~USD 460,000); ATOC trading/crypto-exchange operator: KGS 300m (~USD 3.4m) from 1 July 2026MYR 300,000–1,500,000 by pathway (~USD 75,000–373,000); MYR 1,500,000 for Money Broking DA
Year 1 all-in (statutory + build)USD 234,100–3,320,800USD 94,300–283,900 plus the initial AFSA supervision feeUSD 33,000–60,000USD 98,500–245,000
Corporate Tax0% on crypto until 1 Jan 2029AIFC 0% CIT on qualifying income until 2066; DATF operators and other income 20%Standard CIT; mining 10% electricity tax3% on net audited trading profits with substance; 24% without
Local PresenceUzbek LE; servers in country; 5-year data retentionAIFC registration with substanceKyrgyz entity; no prescribed director count; resident sole executive for a trading operator onlyLabuan IBC + operational office
EU PassportingNoNoNoNo
FATF StatusEAG member; not grey-listed; regular follow-upEAG member; not grey-listedEAG member; not grey-listed; enhanced follow-upFATF member since 2016 (Malaysia) and APG member; not grey-listed
Best ForCentral Asia operators with captive-market positioningPremium AIFC-tier operatorsCost-leader Central Asia entryAPAC-focused operators

Compare every crypto jurisdiction side by side →

Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan are the two serious Central Asia options, distinguished by cost structure and regulatory architecture: Uzbekistan applies its rules nationally through NAPP, while Kazakhstan’s established route is the AIFC’s bespoke jurisdiction, with a National Bank licence for crypto exchanges outside it only since May 2026. Kyrgyzstan is the cost-leader and is not on any FATF list, though it remains in the EAG’s enhanced follow-up; Labuan offers APAC-tier credibility at a lower Year-1 cost, though its digital-asset money-broking capital (RM 1.5 million, about USD 373,000) is about twice Uzbekistan’s.

For operators whose primary market is the EU, none of these jurisdictions is the right answer. The natural cross-tier reference is Estonia’s MiCA CASP regime: prudential safeguards of at least the higher of the EUR 50,000/125,000/150,000 Annex IV class floor and 25% of previous-year fixed overheads (projected first-12-month overheads for a new firm), met by qualifying own funds, insurance or a comparable guarantee, or a combination, 22/78 distributed-profits CIT, and full passporting across the EEA (the 27 EU states plus Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway).[22]

When Uzbekistan Is the Right Choice

Choose Uzbekistan if:

  • The primary target market is the Uzbek captive 660,000-client base or Central Asia more broadly
  • The business model can absorb the local-presence and IT-localisation burden
  • You value a clean FATF status and a clearly codified four-licence taxonomy
  • You can afford the crypto-store or mining-pool category and do not need the full crypto-exchange tier

Consider alternatives if:

  • The EU is the primary target market (Estonia’s MiCA CASP is the natural upgrade)
  • The cost ceiling is below USD 200,000 (Kyrgyzstan is the cost leader, FATF status considered)
  • APAC presence is a priority (Labuan offers a substance-conditional 3% tax regime and APAC-tier credibility)
  • Operating an AIFC-tier exchange is the strategic objective (Kazakhstan AIFC is the regional premium option)

Not sure which column is you? Ask Emma. She compares these jurisdictions in seconds, in your language.

Common Mistakes in Uzbekistan Applications

NAPP’s review patterns and Law ZRU-899’s enforcement reach generate a recurring set of application failures and operational missteps. The following six are the practitioner-level issues that most consistently derail Uzbekistan crypto licensing applications.

  • Assuming a single “VASP” licence covers all activities. Each activity (exchange, store, depository, mining-pool) requires its own licence, with separate state duty and monthly fees. A combined exchange-and-custody business needs two licences, not one.
  • Underestimating the charter-capital reservation rule. Crypto-exchange applicants must deposit 5,000 BRV paid-up and reserve 3,000 BRV in a separate Uzbek commercial-bank account at the date of application. Credit-funded capital is invalid. Late reservation resets the review clock.
  • Using offshore-company shareholders. Companies incorporated in offshore jurisdictions are barred from holding shares in a NAPP-licensed CASP. The structure must be restructured before filing; NAPP review will identify and reject it.
  • Failing to localise servers and data. Platform infrastructure must run on servers physically located in Uzbekistan with five-year data retention. Late-stage IT redesigns to meet the localisation requirement add weeks and material cost to the build.
  • Marketing to Uzbek residents from a foreign entity. The Binance precedent of January 2024 shows that NAPP exercises enforcement reach against unlicensed foreign providers serving Uzbek residents. Fines, lawsuits, and criminal exposure under Law ZRU-899 follow; entry through a licensed local partner is the only compliant route.
  • Confusing IT Park residency with CASP licensing. IT Park’s 0% CIT regime does not extend to licensed crypto-exchange activity; that is NAPP’s 0% regime under paragraph 2 of PP-3832 (as amended by Decree UP-140). The two are complementary (a tech holding can reside in IT Park while the CASP entity operates under NAPP) but not interchangeable.

Frequently Asked Questions

Eligibility

The National Agency for Prospective Projects (NAPP) is the sole crypto-asset regulator in Uzbekistan. NAPP is a presidential agency established in its current form by Presidential Decree DP-121 of , succeeding the National Agency for Project Management (NAPM). It holds exclusive statutory authority over crypto-asset activities including licensing, supervision, and enforcement. The Central Bank of the Republic of Uzbekistan (CBU) supervises AML/CFT compliance across the financial sector and is the open-banking authority under PP-359, but it does not issue crypto licences. Applications are filed directly with NAPP at info@napp.uz, by post, or in person.

Foreign individuals and non-offshore corporate shareholders can own NAPP-licensed CASPs through an Uzbek legal entity (typically an LLC / MChJ). The licence is issued only to Uzbek-registered legal entities, so foreign ownership operates through a domestic holding structure. Companies incorporated in offshore jurisdictions are barred from holding shares in a licensed CASP, irrespective of beneficial ownership transparency.

Operators planning to capitalise through an offshore holding vehicle must restructure before filing. Senior management is expected to include resident staff in practice, though there is no explicit citizenship rule on the NAPP licensing page.

NAPP issues four activity-specific licences under Ministry of Justice registration 3380 of . Crypto-Exchange covers electronic order-book trading platforms (three licensees as of March 2026). Crypto-Store covers retail purchase and sale of crypto-assets brokered to individuals, online and offline (twelve licensees).

Crypto-Depository covers issuance, initial placement, and storage of crypto-assets, equivalent to a custodian and registrar function (six licensees). Mining-Pool covers consolidation of computing power for mining. There is no umbrella VASP or CASP licence; operators combining activities must obtain each licence separately.

Through a separate framework. Beyond the NAPP crypto regime, Uzbekistan has introduced a framework for DLT-issued tokenised equities and bonds traded on regulated exchanges from 2026; a tokenised security runs through that securities-side regime, not a generic crypto licence. Where the vehicle is a fund, route via fund licensing.

Process & Timeline

A realistic timeline is 3–6 months end-to-end from entity formation to licence issuance. Entity registration takes 1–3 business days. Dossier preparation, including the AML manual aligned with Ministry of Justice registration 3309, takes 4–8 weeks. Charter-capital deployment and the 3,000 BRV bank reservation (crypto-exchange applicants only) take 2–4 weeks and must be completed at the date of application.

NAPP must decide within 20 working days of the application; allow 1–3 months for the review stage once requests for supplementary documentation are counted. State-duty payment and licence issuance run 1–2 weeks at the end.

Yes. The Special Regulation Regime in Crypto-Assets Circulation under Decree DP-121 of and Ministry of Justice registration 3409 of permits pilots without a full NAPP licence, with tax exemptions, customs preferences, and a fixed 7.5% personal income tax on sandbox-employee wages. The first three participants registered in 2023 were Uzinfocom, Kapitalbank, and Octobank.

PP-359 of adds a separate sandbox for stablecoins as a means of payment from , on terms NAPP sets with the Central Bank.

Costs & Capital

The crypto-exchange licence carries a one-time state duty of 73,400 BRV, which is UZS 32.296bn or about USD 2,736,700 at the BRV of UZS 440,000 in force since 1 September 2026 and the Central Bank of Uzbekistan rate of 11,801.23 on 28 August 2026, plus a monthly operational fee of 740 BRV (UZS 325,600,000, about USD 27,600 per month).

Charter capital is 5,000 BRV (UZS 2.2bn, about USD 186,400), of which 3,000 BRV (UZS 1.32bn, about USD 111,900) must be reserved in a separate Uzbek commercial-bank account at the date of application.

Every figure is set in BRV multiples, so all of them rose about 6.8% on 1 September 2026 when the Base Calculation Value went from UZS 412,000 to UZS 440,000, and they move again at each revaluation.

Statutory cost in Year 1 is therefore about USD 3,067,800, being the state duty plus twelve monthly fees, and the typical build on top, quoted per case for legal advisory, compliance documentation, IT setup and local presence, is USD 139,500–253,000, so a first year runs about USD 3,207,300–3,320,800. From Year 2 the monthly fee alone is about USD 331,100 a year, with USD 62,000–122,000 of recurring build. For most operators, the crypto-store or mining-pool licence is materially more economical.

The NAPP licensing page does not specify a numerical charter-capital floor for crypto-store, crypto-depository, or mining-pool licences; the 5,000 BRV figure applies only to crypto-exchange. Some consultancies cite a 300,000 dollar minimum for general VASP applications, but this figure cannot be confirmed against NAPP primary sources and should be verified with local counsel before relying on it for financial planning. Uzbek LLC law sets no statutory minimum charter capital, so the practical floor is whatever working capital NAPP considers proportionate to the business plan.

FATF & Banking

Uzbekistan is not on the FATF grey or black list in the FATF statements of . The country is a member of the Eurasian Group on Combating Money Laundering and Financing of Terrorism (EAG), the FATF-style regional body. The 2022 Mutual Evaluation Report rated Uzbekistan Compliant or Largely Compliant on most FATF Recommendations including Largely Compliant on Recommendation 15 (VASPs). The 2023 First Enhanced Follow-Up Report upgraded ratings on Recommendations 6, 7, and 22 and transferred Uzbekistan from enhanced to regular follow-up, the lower-frequency supervisory category, which materially eases correspondent banking relationships.

Yes. Licensed CASPs operate within a domestic banking system supervised by the CBU, with multiple Uzbek commercial banks offering crypto-business accounts. Sandbox banks have launched specialised products. PP-3832 Article 3 exempts licensed CASPs from currency-regulation norms for crypto-related conversions, easing multi-currency operational flow. Cross-border USD settlement is feasible through tier-2 Central Asian and selected Western correspondent banks given Uzbekistan’s clean FATF status.

PP-359 set as the deadline for open-banking infrastructure intended to provide a standardised data-exchange layer between banks, payment organisations and fintech market participants.

EU Market Access

An Uzbekistan licence does not grant EU market access or MiCA passporting rights. Uzbekistan is a non-EU, non-EEA third country, and there is no equivalence regime for third-country crypto licences under MiCA. MiCA Article 61 permits third-country firms to serve EU clients only when the client initiates contact entirely on their own initiative, the reverse-solicitation exemption, but ESMA’s guidelines interpret this very narrowly: they list signs that a firm is likely to be regarded as soliciting, such as EU-targeted marketing, judged on all the facts, and a firm that solicits EU clients cannot rely on the exemption.[27]

Operators seeking systematic EU market access must obtain a separate CASP authorisation in an EU member state. See the full reverse solicitation guide for the operational detail.

Compliance & Reporting

Law ZRU-899 of made unlicensed crypto activity an administrative offence under Article 155⁴ of the Code on Administrative Responsibility (arrest of up to 15 days or a fine of 20 to 30 BRV) and, after an administrative penalty, a crime under Criminal Code Article 278⁸, punishable by up to five years’ imprisonment for especially large-scale offences, abuse of office or an organised group. NAPP fined Binance UZS 99 million in January 2024 for unauthorised provision of services to Uzbek residents; Binance subsequently entered the market through a licensed local partner.

Foreign exchanges are blocked at the network level since August 2022. The compliant route for foreign operators is licensing or partnering with a NAPP-licensed entity.

Presidential Resolution PP-359 of introduced from a regulatory sandbox for stablecoins as a means of payment, on terms NAPP sets with the Central Bank, and allowed Uzbek legal entities to issue tokenised shares and bonds for trading on a separate platform of licensed stock exchanges under a NAPP procedure. Use beyond the sandbox depends on the pilots and on later secondary legislation.

Start Your Uzbekistan Crypto Licence Application

Jagelski & Partners scopes your written brief and introduces an independent licensing specialist who has built and operated regulated crypto businesses. That specialist coordinates the full NAPP licensing process: entity formation, charter-capital reservation, AML compliance documentation, NAPP submission, and post-licensing banking.

Not ready to submit a brief? Ask Emma first. She answers now and can collect your written brief for a specialist introduction.

References

Show all references
  1. Republic of Uzbekistan, Presidential Resolution PP-3832, “On measures to develop the digital economy and the sphere of crypto-assets turnover in the Republic of Uzbekistan”, lex.uz (English, original text); consolidated text, edition of , lex.uz, accessed .
  2. Republic of Uzbekistan, Presidential Decree DP-121, “On measures for further development of the digital economy and the crypto-assets sphere” (27 April 2022), lex.uz, accessed .
  3. Cointelegraph, Uzbekistan blocks access to foreign crypto exchanges over unregistered trading, cointelegraph.com, accessed .
  4. Republic of Uzbekistan, Law ZRU-899, “On amendments and additions to the Criminal Code, Criminal Procedure Code, and Code on Administrative Responsibility” (19 January 2024), lex.uz, accessed .
  5. UzDaily, Uzbekistan Has 21 Crypto Service Providers in 2025, Including Exchanges, Shops, and Depositories (citing NAPP First Deputy Director, 18 March 2026), uzdaily.uz, accessed .
  6. UzDaily, Uzbekistan’s Crypto Turnover Surpasses US$2 Billion in 2025, uzdaily.uz, accessed .
  7. Republic of Uzbekistan, Presidential Resolution PP-359, “On measures for the further development of financial technologies in Uzbekistan” (27 November 2025), lex.uz, accessed .
  8. National Agency for Prospective Projects, Order No. 100 of 5 December 2024 “On determining the amounts of state duty for issuing a licence to crypto-asset service providers” (Ministry of Justice registration 3584 of 17 December 2024: 73,400 / 7,000 / 3,700 / 3,000 BRV at the BRV in force on the payment date), lex.uz, accessed .
  9. Republic of Uzbekistan, Ministry of Justice registration 3309, “Internal Control Rules for Crypto Service Providers” (9 June 2021), lex.uz, accessed .
  10. National Agency for Prospective Projects, Service providers (licensing under registration 3380: decision within 20 working days, charter capital; state duty under registration 3584; monthly charges under registration 3388 of 28 September 2022), napp.uz, accessed .
  11. National Agency for Prospective Projects, List of specially authorized crypto-exchanges for providing a special tax regime to foreign citizens, napp.uz, accessed .
  12. President of the Republic of Uzbekistan, Decree UP-91 of 2 June 2025, item 3(b)(ii) (BRV UZS 412,000 from 1 August 2025), lex.uz, and Decree UP-115 of 23 June 2026, item 3(b)(ii) (BRV UZS 440,000 from 1 September 2026), lex.uz; Central Bank of the Republic of Uzbekistan, Official exchange rates (USD 1 = UZS 11,801.23 on 28 August 2026), cbu.uz, accessed .
  13. Republic of Uzbekistan, Ministry of Justice registration 3507, “Mining Pool Operating Rules” (20 March 2024), lex.uz, accessed .
  14. Republic of Uzbekistan, Ministry of Justice registration 3461, “Mining Permits Procedure” (29 September 2023), lex.uz, accessed .
  15. Republic of Uzbekistan, Law No. 660-II, “On combating the legalization of proceeds from criminal activity, the financing of terrorism and the financing of the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction” (26 August 2004), lex.uz, accessed .
  16. Eurasian Group on Combating Money Laundering and Financing of Terrorism, EAG Mutual Evaluation Report on Uzbekistan (2022), eurasiangroup.org, accessed .
  17. EY Uzbekistan, Decree on Additional Incentives to Support IT Park Residents Involved in Export Activities within the Digitalization Sector, ey.com, accessed .
  18. Crowdfund Insider, Digital Assets Exchange Binance Obtains Authorization To Offer Services In Uzbekistan, crowdfundinsider.com, accessed .
  19. FATF, Uzbekistan’s progress in strengthening measures to tackle money laundering and terrorist financing, First Enhanced Follow-Up Report 2023, fatf-gafi.org, accessed .
  20. Central Bank of the Republic of Uzbekistan, EAG and the Mutual Evaluation of Uzbekistan, cbu.uz, accessed .
  21. President of the Republic of Uzbekistan, Decree UP-140 of 18 September 2024, Annex 1, item 3 (inserts “until 1 January 2029” into paragraph 2 of PP-3832), lex.uz, accessed .
  22. EFTA, EEA-Lex: Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 (MiCA), incorporated into the EEA Agreement by Joint Committee Decision No 41/2025 and in force in the EEA from 24 June 2025; Directive (EU) 2015/2366 (PSD2), JCD 165/2019, in force 1 May 2022; Directive 2009/110/EC (EMD2), JCD 120/2010, in force 1 November 2012; Directive 2014/65/EU (MiFID II), JCD 78/2019, in force 3 December 2019, efta.int, accessed .
  23. OECD Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes, Jurisdictions committed to implement the Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (last update 14 September 2026), oecd.org, and Exchanges of information under the AEOI Standard (as on 20 May 2026), oecd.org (Uzbekistan on neither list), accessed .
  24. FATF, Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring – 19 June 2026 and High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action – 19 June 2026 (Uzbekistan not listed), fatf-gafi.org; Eurasian Group on Combating Money Laundering and Financing of Terrorism, Mutual evaluation reports (Uzbekistan: 1st enhanced follow-up report 2023, 2nd regular follow-up report 2026; Kazakhstan: 1st regular follow-up report 2026; Kyrgyz Republic: 5th enhanced follow-up report 2023), eurasiangroup.org, accessed .
  25. Republic of Uzbekistan, Law ZRU-600 “On State Duty” (6 January 2020), Annex, item 7(b) (1 BRV for registering a business entity or an enterprise with foreign investment) and Article 22¹ (90% when filed through the Unified Portal of Interactive Public Services), edition of , lex.uz, accessed .
  26. National Agency for Prospective Projects, In 2023, the Agency registered three participants of the special regime of “regulatory sandboxes” (8 January 2024), napp.uz, accessed .
  27. European Securities and Markets Authority, Guidelines on reverse solicitation under MiCA (ESMA35-1872330276-2030), paragraphs 14, 23 and 25 and Annex, published , applicable from , esma.europa.eu, accessed .
  28. OECD, Global Anti-Base Erosion Model Rules (Pillar Two), Article 1.1.1 (inclusive revenue threshold and four-year lookback), oecd.org, accessed .
  29. NAPP, Mining permit application system under regulation 3461, napp.uz; Regulation 3461, lex.uz, accessed .
  30. Republic of Uzbekistan, PP-143 of 17 April 2026: Besqala Mining Valley, paragraphs 3–6 and Annex 1, lex.uz, accessed .