Why Choose Kazakhstan for Crypto Licensing?
Kazakhstan offers a common-law digital-asset regime that few jurisdictions outside Dubai can match on regulatory rigour, and none match at the same capital floor. The AIFC operates an English-language, English-law perimeter inside Kazakhstan with its own court, financial-services authority (AFSA), public register, and consolidated digital-asset rulebook in force since .[1] The IOSCO Thematic Review of placed AIFC among four jurisdictions globally that fully implement all ten priority recommendations for crypto and digital-asset markets, alongside the United Arab Emirates, Hong Kong and the European Union under MiCA.[2]
IOSCO Top-Four Recognition Without the Dubai Price Tag
The AIFC sits in the same top tier of IOSCO digital-asset implementation as the UAE and the EU, but its capital floors and authorisation costs are an order of magnitude lower than Dubai’s VARA framework.[3][4] The base capital for operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility (DATF) is USD 200,000 or twelve months of working capital, whichever is higher,[5] compared with AED 1,500,000 (around USD 408,000) for a VARA Exchange Services Provider without a custodian arrangement.[6] For founders who want regulatory credibility that holds up in front of EU correspondent banks and institutional counterparties, but cannot justify Dubai-scale capital deployment at launch, Kazakhstan is the structurally cheaper route to a credible licence.
A Working Crypto-to-Fiat Rail
The AIFC and the National Bank of Kazakhstan formalised cooperation between AIFC-licensed exchanges and Kazakhstan second-tier banks in , building on a 2022 pilot that involved five exchanges and eight banks.[7] As of , 29 AFSA-licensed DASPs (of which 12 are DATFs) processed approximately USD 10.58 billion in regulated digital-asset trading volume for the year, serving around 215,000 users, figures published in the AFSA Annual Report 2025.[8] The crypto-to-fiat bridge is not theoretical: it is operational at scale, with USD, KZT and EUR settlement.
A Tax Regime Worth Reading Carefully
The AIFC tax exemption is genuinely meaningful. AIFC participants pay 0% corporate income tax (CIT) and 0% value-added tax (VAT) on qualifying financial-services income until , and foreign employees of AIFC participants are exempt from personal income tax (PIT) on AIFC employment income.[9] The single most important caveat to understand before structuring: digital-asset trading facility operators are explicitly excluded from the 0% CIT exemption and pay the standard Kazakhstan corporate rate of 20%. Custody, dealing, advising, arranging and stablecoin-issuance DASPs retain the exemption; exchanges do not.
English-Language, Common-Law Operating Environment
The AIFC’s founding instrument adopts the principles of English law and establishes the AIFC Court under the leadership of Lord Burnett of Maldon, the former Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales.[10] English is the official working language of the AIFC, AFSA, the AIFC Court and the public register.[11] For founders accustomed to BVI, Singapore or DIFC, the regulatory and dispute-resolution interface is familiar. For founders coming from the EU, the gap is narrower than it is in BVI or Seychelles, because the AIFC’s IOSCO-aligned rulebook reads in the same conceptual register as MiCA.
Regulatory Framework
The AIFC operates a special legal order inside Kazakhstan, established by the Constitutional Statute on the AIFC No. 438-V of , which adopts the principles of English law within the AIFC perimeter and creates a financial-services regulatory regime separate from mainland Kazakhstan law.[10] The primary digital-asset rulebook is the AIFC Rules on Digital Asset Activities (DAA), AIFC Rules No. FR00062 of 2023, approved on and in force since ; a consolidated version (v2) commenced on , and further AFSA-adopted amendments commence on .[1][12]
Definition: AIFC DASP
A Digital Asset Service Provider (DASP) is an entity authorised by the AFSA to carry on one or more of ten regulated digital-asset activities within the AIFC perimeter, including operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility, dealing in or providing custody of digital assets, advising on or arranging deals in digital assets, and providing money services in relation to digital assets (which includes fiat-stablecoin issuance). The framework is governed by the AIFC Rules on Digital Asset Activities (DAA), supervised by AFSA, and tax-treated under the AIFC’s special regime (with the DATF activity carved out from the 0% CIT exemption). Conceptually, the AIFC DASP designation maps to the FATF Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) perimeter, although terminology differs.
Regulatory History
The AIFC was established to anchor Kazakhstan’s financial-services modernisation strategy and was modelled in part on the DIFC. The digital-asset perimeter was progressively built between 2018 and 2023: an early FinTech Lab regime accommodated crypto exchanges from 2018; Article 4-1 of the Constitutional Statute (added on ) created an explicit constitutional basis for digital-asset regulation; the consolidated DAA replaced the fragmented earlier rules in .[13] From 2022 onwards the National Bank piloted cooperation with AIFC-licensed exchanges to enable crypto-to-fiat conversion through Kazakhstani second-tier banks, formalised in .[7] By , AFSA had authorised 29 DASPs and processed roughly USD 10.58 billion of regulated trading volume in the year.[8]
Recent Regulatory Developments
- : AFSA and Dubai’s VARA sign a memorandum of understanding on cross-border supervision and information exchange.
- : AFSA imposes its largest published fines to date (USD 249,770 and USD 139,533) against two AIFC firms for unauthorised Islamic-finance activity, with the AIFC Court winding up four related entities.[14] The action is non-DASP, but signals AFSA’s enforcement appetite.
- : Phase 2 of the AIFC Rules on Providing Money Services commences, extending the framework adopted on .
- : AFSA adopts capital-market, digital-asset and crowdfunding framework amendments effective , including a revised DATF capital formula and the inclusion of digital-asset holdings in the Assessed Professional Client wealth test up to 50%.[12]
- : Fees Rules amendments take effect, raising the digital-asset add-on application fee to USD 2,800 and capping the variable supervision fee at USD 250,000.[15]
- : IOSCO Thematic Review identifies AIFC as one of four jurisdictions globally fully implementing all ten priority recommendations on crypto and digital-asset markets.[2]
- : AFSA accepts the first regulatory-fee payment in USD-pegged stablecoin under a Multilateral Memorandum of Understanding (MoU).
- : AFSA grants the AIFC’s first fiat-backed stablecoin licence to a CNH-pegged issuer under DAA Part 4.
Regulatory Overlap
Three regimes can apply simultaneously to AIFC DASPs depending on activity:
- AIFC DAA. Primary licensing rulebook for all digital-asset activity inside the AIFC perimeter.
- AIFC AML/CFT/Sanctions Rules (Amendment No. 7, ). Applies to every DASP regardless of activity; embeds FATF Travel Rule obligations and aligns with the FATF Best Practices on Travel Rule Supervision of .[16]
- AIFC Rules on Providing Money Services. Applies to DASPs issuing fiat- or commodity-backed stablecoins (Phase 1 from ; Phase 2 from ).
The mainland Kazakhstan AML law (Law No. 191-IV of “On Counteracting Legalisation of Criminally Obtained Income and Financing of Terrorism”) governs reporting to the Financial Monitoring Agency (FMA) of the Republic of Kazakhstan, which AFSA-licensed DASPs file into for STRs and SARs.
Tokenised securities and RWA
Security tokens and tokenised real-world assets sit outside the DASP regime described above. They run through a separate AIFC pathway: the AIFC Security Token Offering (STO) Framework, in force since , which governs the issuance and trading of security tokens within the AIFC perimeter and is one of the earliest dedicated STO regimes globally. Authorisation for security-token issuance and trading is granted by AFSA under that framework, not under a digital-asset activity head. The distinction matters: a national crypto authorisation under Kazakhstan’s Law on Digital Assets (in force , which covers non-security crypto such as exchanges and mining) does not extend to security tokens, and neither does an AIFC DASP licence.
Where a token is a financial instrument, a tokenised share, bond or fund interest, we scope the security-token route through the AIFC STO Framework rather than the DASP heads, and we pair it with crypto custody or trading permissions only where the operating model needs them. For fund-unit tokenisation specifically, the analysis runs through our fund licensing guidance, where the vehicle stays under the fund regime rather than a securities regulator.
License Types and Activities Covered
The AIFC recognises ten Digital Asset Service Provider activity heads under the DAA, each requiring a separate AFSA authorisation. Applicants can hold one or several authorisations under the same legal entity, subject to AFSA approval. The activities collectively cover the FATF VASP perimeter and broadly map to MiCA’s ten CASP services, although terminology and capital differ.[1][17]
Covered Activities
- Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility (DATF). Running a venue that matches buyers and sellers of digital assets, with or without integrated custody. The flagship DASP category, twelve of the 29 licensed DASPs operate DATFs.
- Dealing in Digital Assets as Principal. Buying and selling digital assets on own account against clients, including over-the-counter (OTC) market-making.
- Dealing in Digital Assets as Agent. Executing trades on behalf of clients without taking principal risk; broker-style activity.
- Managing Investments (Digital Asset Portfolios). Discretionary or non-discretionary portfolio management of clients’ digital assets.
- Managing a Collective Investment Scheme (Digital Asset CIS). Operating a regulated fund whose constituent assets are digital assets, in line with the AIFC Collective Investment Scheme Rules.
- Providing Custody of Digital Assets. Holding, controlling or safeguarding clients’ digital assets, including private-key management.
- Arranging Custody of Digital Assets. Acting as an intermediary that places clients’ digital assets with a third-party custodian.
- Advising on Investments in Digital Assets. Providing personal recommendations to clients on digital-asset transactions.
- Arranging Deals in Investments in Digital Assets. Bringing parties together to enter into digital-asset transactions without dealing as principal or agent.
- Providing Money Services in Relation to Digital Assets. Issuance, transmission and exchange of fiat-backed and commodity-backed stablecoins, governed by DAA Part 4 and the Providing Money Services Rules.
What Does NOT Require Registration
- Privacy-token activity is prohibited under the DAA, not merely unregistered. AFSA does not authorise activity in tokens designed to obfuscate transaction trails.
- Issuance of unsecured digital assets to Kazakhstan residents outside the AIFC perimeter is prohibited under mainland law (Law “On Digital Assets in the Republic of Kazakhstan”, Article 11(5), effective ). This is a hard restriction on advertising, not an AIFC matter.
- Pure mining and validation activity falls under the mainland regime and Astana Hub framework, not under AFSA’s DASP perimeter. AIFC DASPs that wish to mine for their own account need separate consideration of mainland licensing.
- Personal use of digital assets by AIFC employees and residents is not within the DASP perimeter.
Activity Restrictions
Kazakhstan-resident retail clients are subject to a USD 1,000 monthly transaction cap and are barred from margin trading on AFSA-licensed DATFs. AIFC participants are prohibited from advertising initial token offerings to Kazakhstan residents outside the AIFC. From , the Assessed Professional Client classification permits inclusion of digital-asset holdings in the wealth test up to 50% of total investable assets, a meaningful loosening from the previous wholly-fiat treatment.[12]
Requirements
AFSA applies an integrated set of capital, substance, governance, technology and AML requirements that scale by activity head. The minimum capital for advisory and arranging activity is USD 10,000, rising to USD 200,000 for DATF operators and USD 250,000 for principal dealers and custodians.[5] In every case applicants must maintain liquid assets of at least 25% of annual operating expenditure (Expenditure-Based Capital Minimum, EBCM), maintain physical presence on AIFC territory, and conduct their core income-generating activities (CIGA) on AIFC territory; outsourcing of CIGA outside Kazakhstan is not permitted.[18]
Capital Requirements by Activity
| Activity Head | Base Capital (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Operating a DATF | 200,000 or 12 months working capital, whichever is higher | If DATF includes integrated custody, 250,000 |
| Dealing in Digital Assets as Principal | 250,000 | Matched-principal only: 50,000 |
| Dealing in Digital Assets as Agent | 50,000 | |
| Managing Investments | 100,000 | |
| Managing a Collective Investment Scheme | 50,000 / 150,000 / 250,000 | By scheme type (per AIFC CIS Rules) |
| Providing Custody | 250,000 | |
| Arranging Custody | 10,000 | |
| Advising on Investments | 10,000 | |
| Arranging Deals in Investments | 10,000 | |
| Providing Money Services (incl. fiat stablecoin issuer) | 200,000 | Plus 1:1 reserve requirement for stablecoin issuance |
| Liquid asset floor | ≥25% of Annual Operating Expenditure (EBCM) | Applies to every DASP |
Intangible assets are excluded from regulatory capital. Stablecoin reserves must be held 1:1, segregated, in a FATF-equivalent jurisdiction custodian, marked to market daily, and independently audited annually under DAA Part 4. As of ; verify capital figures against current DAA v2 before submission.
Governance and Senior Management Regime
DASPs must appoint Approved Individuals (AIs) for six controlled functions: Senior Executive Officer (SEO), Finance Officer, Compliance Officer, Money Laundering Reporting Officer (MLRO), Deputy MLRO, and Chief Information Technology Officer (CITO). AFSA may direct appointment of a separate Risk Manager where the business model warrants. The Effective Board is collectively accountable for the firm’s compliance with the AIFC Acts. Each AI is subject to fit-and-proper assessment under the General Rules, Chapter 4, and approval before the firm can commence regulated activity.[19]
Substance and Substantial Presence
The AIFC Rules on Substantial Presence (adopted by AFSA in coordination with the Kazakhstan Ministry of Finance) require AIFC participants applying the 0% CIT and 0% VAT exemptions to conduct their CIGA on AIFC territory, maintain expenditure on AIFC territory commensurate with that CIGA, and employ adequate full-time staff on AIFC territory. Outsourcing of CIGA outside Kazakhstan is not permitted. The substance test is verified through the annual tax audit; failure removes the tax exemption retroactively.[18] In practice this rules out the shell-with-virtual-office structure that some applicants assume is workable on a reading of the headline capital figures.
Technology and Cyber Requirements
Every DASP must maintain a documented cyber-security policy, segregate hot- and cold-wallet holdings, implement key-management procedures appropriate to scale, conduct daily reconciliation between book and on-chain balances, and commission an annual third-party audit of technology governance and IT systems before authorisation and on each subsequent renewal cycle.[1] DATFs must additionally subject member systems to regular testing. There is no standalone DORA-style ICT rulebook in the AIFC: technology requirements are integrated into the DAA proper, which means cyber and operational-resilience obligations are read alongside conduct and prudential rules rather than as a separate workstream.
Application Process
AFSA’s published authorisation pathway runs from pre-application engagement through Authorisation In Principle (AIP) to full licence, with a parallel registration through the AIFC Registrar of Companies. AFSA describes pre-application engagement as a “general recommendation rather than an option” and applicants who skip it routinely face longer review cycles and additional information requests.[20] The application language is English throughout; supporting documents in Russian or Kazakh are accepted but must be accompanied by certified English translations.
Pre-application engagement
Engage the AIFC Client Office and AFSA Authorisation team before drafting documentation. AFSA expects to see the regulatory business plan, governance structure and AI candidates discussed in principle before formal submission. Pre-application weeks are not counted in published timelines, but they meaningfully reduce the rejection and resubmission rate in the formal phase.
Form an AIFC entity and engage AIFC participants
Forming a Kazakhstan AIFC private company (Limited Liability Partnership or Private Limited Company) through the AIFC Registrar of Companies is the first step. This runs in parallel with appointing an AIFC-based legal adviser, leasing AIFC office space, and onboarding key personnel. AIFC entity formation typically takes 7–15 business days through the Self-Service Portal. See the Kazakhstan company formation guide for entity-type selection and registration mechanics.
Prepare the Regulatory Business Plan and supporting policies
Draft a three-year regulatory business plan with financial projections, AML/CFT/sanctions policies, IT and cyber-risk policies, custody and wallet-management procedures, complaints handling, conflicts of interest, business continuity plan and a Risk Mitigation Programme. Commission the mandatory third-party technology audit. The compliance documentation pack is the most time-intensive component.
Submit through the AFSA Self-Service Portal
File the application with all supporting documents, paid application fee (USD 2,800 digital-asset add-on plus base activity fees), Approved Individual applications (USD 500 each in full regime, USD 200 in FinTech Lab), and the regulatory business plan. AFSA acknowledges the application and begins formal review.
Formal AFSA review and information requests
AFSA assesses fit-and-proper of Controllers and AIs, capital adequacy, governance, operational readiness and AML/CFT robustness. Expect one to three rounds of formal information requests, each typically with a 14- to 28-day response window.
Authorisation In Principle (AIP) and conditions
AFSA issues AIP with a set of conditions to be satisfied before the licence becomes effective: capital deposit, banking arrangement, final AI appointments, evidence of substance, completion of third-party audits, and so on.
Full licence and commencement
On satisfaction of AIP conditions, AFSA grants the full licence and the firm appears on the AFSA Public Register. The initial supervision fee is payable within 21 days of grant.
Jagelski & Partners’ specialist compliance partners draft the AML/CFT/sanctions framework, the Travel Rule policy, the custody and wallet-management procedures, and the technology governance documentation as part of the AIFC DASP licensing engagement. The compliance documentation is the most time-intensive component of any AIFC DASP application, requiring eight to twelve weeks of specialist work that cannot be shortcut with generic templates. AFSA specifically tests whether policies are bespoke to the applicant’s business model rather than generic boilerplate. Speak to us at the start of Stage 2 to scope the engagement.[21]
FinTech Lab On-Ramp
For novel models or earlier-stage firms, the FinTech Lab is the recommended on-ramp. Nineteen of the 29 currently authorised DASPs began in FinTech Lab and migrated to the full regime.[8] Application and supervision fees are reduced, capital requirements are scaled, and AFSA provides closer supervisory engagement. Operators in FinTech Lab as of have until end of 2026 to migrate to the full regime.
Required Documents
AFSA’s Authorisation Pack lists every document required at submission. The pack divides into five categories: corporate documents, personal documents for every Controller and Approved Individual, the compliance documentation suite, the business plan and financial projections, and the technology and operational documentation. AFSA expects bespoke, AIFC-specific policies rather than generic crypto-industry templates; reviewers actively test against this.[20]
Corporate Documents
- Certificate of incorporation and constitutional documents of the AIFC entity (issued by the AIFC Registrar of Companies).
- Group structure chart from the operating entity up to ultimate beneficial owners, with percentages.
- Certified shareholders’ register and most recent annual return.
- Certified register of directors and senior officers.
Personal Documents (every Controller, Approved Individual and 10%+ UBO)
- Certified passport and proof of address (utility bill or bank statement dated within three months).
- Police clearance certificate (or equivalent) from every jurisdiction of residence in the past ten years, dated within three months.
- Curriculum vitae detailing relevant financial-services experience.
- Financial standing declaration with supporting bank statements or tax filings.
- Completed AFSA Fit and Proper Form, signed.
Compliance Documentation
AFSA expects bespoke, AIFC-specific policies rather than generic crypto-industry templates. Jagelski & Partners’ specialist compliance partners draft the AIFC-specific compliance pack as part of the licensing engagement: the AML/CFT/sanctions framework calibrated to the Kazakhstan FMA reporting interface and AIFC AML/CFT Rules Amendment 7, the Travel Rule policy applying the AIFC AML Rules threshold, custody and wallet-management procedures, the cyber-risk policy compatible with the mandatory third-party technology audit, conflicts of interest, complaints handling, and business continuity / disaster recovery. The list below details the typical pack components:
- AML/CFT/Sanctions Manual. Risk-based customer due-diligence framework calibrated to AIFC AML/CFT Rules Amendment 7 and Kazakhstan FMA filing requirements.
- Travel Rule Policy. Procedure for collecting, transmitting and receiving originator/beneficiary information on virtual-asset transfers, aligned with FATF Recommendation 16.
- Custody and Wallet Management Procedure. Hot/cold segregation, multi-signature controls, key-management lifecycle, daily reconciliation.
- Cyber and Information Security Policy. Tested annually by a third-party auditor; integrated with the BCP and incident-response plan.
- Conflicts of Interest Policy. Identification, escalation, mitigation.
- Complaints Handling Procedure. Aligned with AFSA Conduct of Business (COB) Rules.
- Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery Plan. RPO/RTO assumptions tested annually.
- Outsourcing Policy. With AFSA-mandated carve-out: CIGA cannot be outsourced outside Kazakhstan.
- Risk Mitigation Programme. Post-licence compliance roadmap submitted with the application.
Business Plan and Financial Projections
- Three-year regulatory business plan describing target clients, products, distribution channels, market entry, regulatory rationale and exit scenarios.
- Three-year financial projections (P&L, balance sheet, cash flow) including base, stretch and downside scenarios.
- Capital deployment plan demonstrating compliance with the activity-specific capital floor and 25% EBCM liquid-asset requirement.
Technology and Operational Documentation
- Description of the technology stack, including custody architecture, trading-engine design (for DATFs), settlement flow and on-chain integration.
- Third-party technology audit report (mandatory before AIP).
- CITO appointment and supporting CV.
- Outsourcing register with the AFSA-mandated CIGA carve-out.
Costs and Pricing
AFSA publishes its fee schedule in the AIFC Fees Rules, with the most recent amendments effective raising the digital-asset application add-on to USD 2,800 and reducing the variable supervision-fee cap to USD 250,000.[15] AFSA accepts USD-pegged stablecoins (USDT and USDC) for regulatory fees since , the first jurisdiction in Central Asia to do so. The total cost of obtaining and operating an AIFC DASP licence is materially below VARA Dubai across every activity tier and broadly in line with Singapore (MAS) for comparable activity heads.
Government / AFSA Fees
| Fee Item | Amount (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Digital-asset add-on application fee | 2,800 | Per activity head; multi-activity charged at highest fee + 50% per additional |
| Approved Individual application | 500 (full regime) / 200 (FinTech Lab) | Per AI; minimum six AIs typically required |
| AIFC company registration (Self-Service Portal) | 500 | Paper submission: 1,500 |
| Change-of-control application | 1,400 | If applicable at launch |
| FinTech Lab token-admission application | 50 | Per token, FinTech Lab participants |
| Initial supervision fee | Variable | Payable within 21 days of grant; covers Risk Mitigation Programme |
| Annual supervision fee (fixed + variable) | Capped at 250,000 | Variable component based on average daily volume × active days for DATFs |
Total Cost Summary
| Cost Component | Year 1 Range (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| AFSA regulatory fees (application + AIs + supervision) | 6,000–30,000 | Single-activity DASP at lower end; multi-activity DATF at upper |
| AIFC company formation and registered office | 3,000–8,000 | Includes Registrar fees, initial year of office and registered address |
| Legal advisory (AIFC counsel) | 30,000–60,000 | End-to-end authorisation guidance |
| Compliance documentation pack (AML, Travel Rule, custody, cyber) | 20,000–40,000 | Bespoke, not template |
| Third-party technology audit | 8,000–20,000 | Mandatory before AIP |
| Substance setup (AIFC office, local hires, executive search) | 20,000–50,000 | Genuine AIFC-territory CIGA, not virtual |
| Initial capital deposit | 10,000–250,000+ | Depends on activity head; not a cost but locked capital |
| Total Year 1 (excl. capital deposit) | 90,000–180,000 | Single-activity DASP at lower end; DATF at upper |
| Annual Ongoing Cost (Year 2 onwards) | 50,000–120,000 | AFSA supervision, ongoing compliance, AIFC office, AIs, technology audit |
All figures as of ; verify against current AFSA Fees Rules at aifc.kz before submission. AFSA fee variations for waivers and concessions are available case-by-case but are not advertised in the Fees Rules.
Timeline
The headline authorisation timeline runs from initial AFSA engagement to licence grant. A well-prepared single-activity DASP authorisation completes faster than a DATF or multi-activity package, because the technology audit, capital deposit and Approved Individual approval cycle scale with scope. The cumulative figures below assume each stage runs in sequence; in practice several stages overlap.
| Stage | Duration | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-application engagement with AIFC Client Office and AFSA | 2–4 weeks | 2–4 weeks |
| AIFC entity formation through Registrar of Companies | 2–4 weeks | 4–8 weeks |
| Regulatory business plan and compliance documentation drafting | 8–12 weeks | 12–20 weeks |
| Third-party technology audit | 4–8 weeks (parallel) | 12–20 weeks |
| Formal AFSA review and information rounds | 8–20 weeks | 20–40 weeks |
| Authorisation In Principle conditions satisfaction | 4–12 weeks | 24–52 weeks |
| Full licence grant | 1–2 weeks | 25–54 weeks |
The fastest realistic timeline for a well-prepared single-activity DASP authorisation (Advising on Investments, Arranging Deals) is approximately four months from initial AFSA engagement to licence grant. DATF authorisations and multi-activity packages routinely run six to twelve months because the technology audit, capital deposit and AI approval cycle take longer in proportion to scope. The FinTech Lab on-ramp adds an additional six to eighteen months between FinTech Lab entry and full-regime migration, but reduces capital and fee burden during the testing phase and is the recommended route for novel models.
Taxation
The AIFC operates one of the most favourable special tax regimes in Eurasia, but the structure has one important carve-out for digital-asset operators that founders frequently miss. AIFC participants pay 0% corporate income tax and 0% VAT on qualifying financial-services income until , and foreign employees of AIFC participants are exempt from personal income tax on AIFC employment income, conditional on satisfying the AIFC Substantial Presence Rules.[9][18] Digital-asset trading facility operators are explicitly excluded from the 0% CIT exemption.
Tax Table
| Tax Type | Rate | Crypto Application |
|---|---|---|
| Corporate Income Tax (AIFC participant, non-DATF) | 0% | Until 1 January 2066, conditional on substance test |
| Corporate Income Tax (DATF operator) | 20% | Standard Kazakhstan rate; AIFC exemption does not apply |
| Value Added Tax (AIFC participant, qualifying) | 0% | Until 2066, conditional on substance |
| Value Added Tax (DATF operator) | 12% | Standard Kazakhstan rate |
| Personal Income Tax (foreign employees of AIFC participants) | 0% | On AIFC employment income only |
| Personal Income Tax (Kazakhstan tax residents) | 10% | On Kazakhstan-source income |
| Withholding Tax (dividends, AIFC) | 0% | Subject to AIFC participant status |
| Withholding Tax (royalties, IP-derived income) | 15% | IP-derived income NOT exempt under AIFC regime |
| Capital Gains Tax (AIFC investment residents on AIX securities) | 0% | Limited exemption |
As of . Verify against the Kazakhstan State Revenue Committee and the latest AIFC tax notice before structuring.
CRS and CARF Reporting
Kazakhstan implements the Common Reporting Standard (CRS) through agreements coordinated by the State Revenue Committee, and is in the OECD Inclusive Framework. The Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF) is on Kazakhstan’s adoption pathway, with the Ministry of Finance and AFSA expected to issue implementing rules during 2026. AIFC DASPs should plan for first reporting cycles in 2027–2028 in line with global CARF timing.
Double Taxation Treaty Network
Kazakhstan has 55 conventions in force for the avoidance of double taxation, including with the United Kingdom, Germany, France, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, China and most CIS member states.[22] AIFC participants generally qualify for treaty relief subject to the substance test under the AIFC Substantial Presence Rules.
Substance Condition
Every tax exemption is conditional on satisfaction of the Substantial Presence Rules (set out under Requirements, above): CIGA on AIFC territory, adequate full-time employees, commensurate local expenditure, and no outsourcing of CIGA outside Kazakhstan, verified through the annual tax audit. Failure removes the exemption retroactively to the start of the relevant tax year.[18]
Ongoing Compliance & Post-Registration
AFSA supervises authorised DASPs through periodic reporting, thematic reviews, on-site inspections and enforcement powers. The AIFC’s IOSCO-recognised supervisory model is one of the AIFC’s clearest competitive advantages over light-touch offshore peers, but it does translate into a real ongoing compliance burden. Founders should plan for a year-round compliance cadence rather than a one-off authorisation push.
Annual Reporting
- Audited financial statements filed within four months of financial year-end.
- Quarterly prudential returns demonstrating ongoing compliance with capital and EBCM requirements.
- Annual AML/CFT return covering customer-due-diligence statistics, STR/SAR volumes and risk assessment updates.
- Annual Risk Mitigation Programme update to AFSA.
- Annual third-party technology audit (refreshed each year).
Inspections and Thematic Reviews
AFSA conducts both routine and thematic supervisory visits. The AFSA 2025 Annual Report documents thematic reviews of digital-asset segregation, cyber-resilience and Travel Rule implementation across DASP firms.[8] Visit frequency scales with firm size and activity head: DATFs typically receive annual on-site engagement; smaller advisers operate on a remote-supervision cadence with periodic spot checks.
Enforcement Powers
AFSA’s enforcement toolkit includes warnings, financial penalties, licence variation or withdrawal, prohibition orders against named individuals, public censure, and AIFC Court compulsory winding-up petitions. The AFSA Revised Enforcement Policy of sets out the calibration framework. The largest published AFSA fine to date () imposed USD 249,770 on one AIFC firm and USD 139,533 on a related entity for unauthorised Islamic-finance activity, with the AIFC Court winding up four related entities.[14] The action was non-DASP, but it confirms AFSA’s willingness to act decisively when warranted.
Material Change Notifications
Any change of Controller, change of senior management, material amendment to the regulatory business plan, change of auditor, or addition of new activities requires AFSA notification or pre-approval. AFSA’s change-of-control application fee is USD 1,400. Material changes implemented without notification can result in licence variation, financial penalty or enforcement action.
Banking
The AIFC has the most developed crypto-to-fiat banking rail in Central Asia, anchored by formal cooperation between AIFC-licensed exchanges and Kazakhstan second-tier banks since the National Bank and AFSA signed implementing rules in .[7] The 2022 pilot involved five AIFC exchanges and eight Kazakhstani banks; the framework now supports the full 29-DASP ecosystem with USD, KZT and EUR settlement. Banking onboarding remains a process that takes time, but unlike some offshore jurisdictions the rail is operational rather than aspirational.
Banking Archetypes Available to AIFC DASPs
The institutional bank landscape relevant to AIFC DASPs falls into four archetypes:
- Kazakhstan second-tier banks with AIFC cooperation status. Provide KZT accounts, crypto-to-fiat conversion under the National Bank / AFSA framework, and increasingly USD and EUR multi-currency facilities. The natural fit for an AIFC DASP’s primary operating account.
- International banks with AIFC branches or representative offices. Provide multi-currency banking, often with global treasury management capability. Onboarding selectivity reflects each bank’s own risk appetite for digital-asset clients.
- EU and UK electronic money institutions accepting AIFC-licensed clients. Useful for international receivables and cross-border B2B flows. AIFC licence-recognition by EU EMIs has improved materially since the IOSCO Thematic Review of .
- MENA and APAC payment institutions. Relevant for AIFC DASPs whose client base is concentrated in GCC, Turkey, Pakistan or Southeast Asia.
Settlement Currencies and FX
USD, KZT and EUR are the operational settlement currencies. The Kazakhstani tenge floats freely; AIFC participants are exempt from certain Kazakhstan currency-control restrictions under Article 5 of the Constitutional Statute. CNY settlement has been increasing since the first CNH-pegged stablecoin licence in .
Onboarding Reality
Bank onboarding typically takes 30–90 days from first contact to operational account. The common friction points are source-of-funds documentation for Controllers, beneficial-ownership disclosure for AIFC group structures, and sanctions screening where the Controller is Russian-origin or has CIS exposure. Pre-qualified introductions reduce both onboarding time and rejection rate.
Jagelski & Partners’ banking placement network spans more than 90 institutions across Europe, the United Kingdom, the Middle East, Asia-Pacific, the Caribbean and the Americas. We do not mark up institutional banking or EMI pricing. A licence without banking access is a certificate on the wall: learn about our Banking service →
Kazakhstan is the rare market in the region where the domestic rail already works: the AFSA cooperation framework gives AIFC DASPs a live route into second-tier banks, while USD and EUR correspondent access still turns on the quality of the introduction.
Kazakhstan second-tier banks under the AFSA cooperation framework, international banks with AIFC presence, EU and UK EMIs, and MENA and APAC payment institutions, planned as a single architecture. The partner network maintains live account-opening routes in every jurisdiction Jagelski & Partners services, and banking feasibility is confirmed at the scoping stage, before any licence application is filed.
Explore Banking SolutionsFATF Status & International Standing
Kazakhstan is a member of the Eurasian Group on Combating Money Laundering and Financing of Terrorism (EAG), a FATF-style regional body, and is not currently on the FATF list of “Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring” (grey list) or “High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action” (black list) as of .[23] The AIFC has independently achieved international recognition as a regulator through the IOSCO Thematic Review of (see Why Choose Kazakhstan, above).[2] AFSA is a signatory to the IOSCO Multilateral Memorandum of Understanding (MMoU) and the Enhanced Multilateral Memorandum of Understanding (EMMoU), joined the I-SCAN supervisory cooperation network in 2025, and signed a cross-supervision MoU with Dubai’s VARA on .
EU Market Access
An AIFC DASP authorisation does not confer EU passporting rights. MiCA contains no third-country equivalence regime for digital-asset service providers as of , and AFSA has not publicly announced an equivalence application. MiCA Article 61 permits third-country firms to serve EU clients only when the client initiates contact entirely on their own initiative. ESMA’s Article 61 Guidelines (applicable from ) interpret this restrictively: any EU-targeted marketing, EU-language content, geo-targeted advertising, or use of EU-based influencers constitutes solicitation that voids the exemption. For full detail on what constitutes solicitation, the negative-scope test and the documentation requirements, see Reverse Solicitation Under MiCA →.
Advantages and Limitations
The AIFC presents a coherent set of trade-offs rather than a uniformly easy or hard choice. The IOSCO recognition and the AIFC’s English-law common-law operating environment are genuine differentiators; the DATF tax carve-out and the absence of an MiCA passport are real constraints. The decision turns on target market, activity mix and the founder’s tolerance for the AIFC’s substance bar.
- IOSCO top-four implementation recognition (October 2025). AIFC is one of four jurisdictions globally fully implementing all ten priority crypto-asset and digital-asset recommendations, alongside the UAE, Hong Kong and the EU.
- 0% corporate tax until 2066 for non-DATF DASPs. Custody, dealing, advising, arranging and stablecoin-issuance DASPs benefit from the AIFC tax exemption subject to the substance condition.
- Common-law environment with English-language regulator and court. AFSA and the AIFC Court operate in English under principles of English law, materially reducing the legal-interface gap for founders coming from UK, BVI, Singapore or DIFC backgrounds.
- Capital floors below VARA across every tier. DATF capital is USD 200,000 vs. AED 1,500,000 (around USD 408,000) for VARA Exchange Services without integrated custody. Custody and dealing-as-principal floors at USD 250,000 sit below VARA equivalents.
- Operational crypto-to-fiat banking rail. AFSA’s cooperation framework with Kazakhstan second-tier banks (formalised January 2024) provides KZT, USD and EUR settlement at scale for the 29-DASP ecosystem.
- No grey-list overhead. Kazakhstan is not currently on the FATF grey or black list.
- No EU passporting. AIFC DASP licence does not confer rights to provide crypto-asset services to EU residents. Mitigation: Operators targeting EU clients can obtain a separate CASP authorisation in an EU member state (full market access via passporting) or, for isolated genuinely unsolicited contacts only, may fall within the narrow reverse solicitation exemption under MiCA Article 61. Reverse solicitation is an exemption for specific circumstances, not an alternative to CASP authorisation.
- DATF tax carve-out. Exchange operators do not benefit from the 0% AIFC corporate-tax regime and pay Kazakhstan standard CIT of 20%. Mitigation: Structure exchange activity as a sister entity to other AIFC activities where consolidated tax benefit is sought; some operators run custody and stablecoin issuance in a tax-exempt AIFC entity alongside a separate DATF entity that pays standard CIT.
- Substance bar is genuine, not nominal. AFSA requires AIFC-territory CIGA, AIFC office space and full-time AIFC-based staff; outsourcing of CIGA outside Kazakhstan is not permitted. Mitigation: Plan AIFC physical presence (office, executive search, AIFC-resident senior staff) from the outset; budget approximately USD 20,000–50,000 for substance setup in Year 1.
- Russian-origin Controllers face additional banking-onboarding friction. Kazakhstan is not under OFAC sanctions, but USD and EUR correspondent screening means Russian-passport beneficial owners face deeper due diligence at the international bank layer. Mitigation: Pre-qualified banking introductions, source-of-funds dossier preparation, and (where appropriate) AIFC-resident Controllers as part of the launch team.
- Single-jurisdiction supervisor. Unlike the FCA (UK), DFSA (DIFC) and MAS (Singapore), AFSA does not have the same depth of cross-border enforcement track record. Mitigation: For operators whose institutional counterparties weight regulator track record heavily, plan dual-licensing with a Tier-1 jurisdiction (DIFC, Singapore) once scale supports it.
How Kazakhstan Compares
For founders weighing the AIFC against regional alternatives, the natural peer set is Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan within the CIS bloc, and the United Arab Emirates as the regional regulatory upgrade. The AIFC sits clearly above Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan on regulatory rigour and banking access, and clearly below the UAE on capital deployment cost while matching the UAE on IOSCO recognition. Estonia, under MiCA, is the natural cross-tier EU reference for operators weighing AIFC credibility against full EU passporting access.
| Factor | Kazakhstan (AIFC) | Kyrgyzstan | Uzbekistan | UAE (VARA, Dubai) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Licence Type | AIFC DASP under AFSA | Virtual Asset Service Provider under FMRS | National Agency for Project Management VASP licence | VARA VASP licence (Dubai) |
| Regulator | Astana Financial Services Authority (AFSA) | Financial Market Regulation Service (FMRS / Finnadzor) | National Agency for Perspective Projects (NAPP) | Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA) |
| Timeline | 4–12 months | 3–6 months | 3–6 months | 4–18 months |
| Min. Capital | USD 10,000–250,000 by activity | KGS 40M (around USD 460,000) exchange office; KGS 300M (around USD 3.4M) trading operator from | 5,000 BCV (around USD 144,000) for a crypto-exchange; no published floor for other categories | AED 100,000–1,500,000 (around USD 27,000–408,000) |
| Total Year 1 Cost | USD 90,000–180,000 | USD 35,000–65,000 + paid-up capital | USD 220,000–2,800,000 (category-dependent; one-time state duty is the main driver) | USD 410,000–2,700,000 |
| Corporate Tax | 0% (DATF: 20%) | 10% standard; some exemptions | 15% standard; 0% on licensed crypto operations until 2028 | 9% federal CIT |
| Local Presence | AIFC office + CIGA on territory + AIFC-resident staff | Kyrgyz entity + minimal substance | Uzbek entity + minimal substance | Dubai office + UAE staff |
| EU Passporting | No (reverse-solicitation only) | No | No | No |
| FATF Status | Member EAG; not grey-listed | Member EAG; not grey-listed | Member EAG; not grey-listed | Member MENAFATF; removed from grey list 2024 |
| Best For | IOSCO-grade operators serving CIS, MENA, APAC | Lightest-touch CIS entry point | Domestic Uzbek market + regional reach | Global Tier-1 operators with deeper capital |
Compare every crypto jurisdiction side by side →
Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan compete on cost and timeline, not on regulatory depth. Founders selecting either jurisdiction typically prioritise speed-to-market and minimum capital deployment over institutional banking access, IOSCO recognition or enforcement track record. The AIFC’s capital floors are higher but its regulatory standing and crypto-fiat banking rail are materially stronger. The UAE outranks Kazakhstan on absolute institutional banking depth and global brand recognition, but at several times the all-in Year 1 cost.
When Kazakhstan Is the Right Choice
Choose Kazakhstan if your target market is CIS, Eurasian, MENA or APAC; you prefer a common-law operating environment under English-language supervision; you want IOSCO-grade regulatory rigour at sub-VARA capital floors; or you intend to issue a regional stablecoin under DAA Part 4. Consider alternatives if your primary market is EU retail (Cyprus, Lithuania or Malta under MiCA are the better routes); you require minimum-substance lightest-touch authorisation at lowest cost (Kyrgyzstan or Uzbekistan); or you require global Tier-1 institutional banking depth and your capital deployment is comfortable above USD 400,000 (Dubai VARA or DIFC).
Not sure which column is you? Ask Emma. She compares these jurisdictions in seconds, in your language.
Common Mistakes in Kazakhstan Applications
AFSA’s authorisation process is sufficiently structured that the most common reasons for delay or rejection are predictable. Applicants who anticipate these issues and prepare against them in pre-application engagement materially reduce both the timeline and the iteration count with AFSA reviewers.
- Underestimating the substance requirement. Founders who arrive at AFSA with a virtual office, outsourced CIGA, and no AIFC-resident senior staff routinely return for substantial rework. The Substantial Presence Rules are a hard condition for the tax exemption and a material factor in the authorisation assessment. Plan AIFC physical presence and AIFC-territory CIGA from the outset of the application, not at Authorisation In Principle.
- Submitting generic compliance documentation. AFSA reviewers explicitly test whether AML/CFT policies, custody procedures, Travel Rule policies and cyber-risk frameworks are bespoke to the applicant’s business model. Generic templates pulled from offshore libraries are recognised on sight and trigger additional review rounds. Compliance documentation must reference the AIFC AML/CFT Rules Amendment 7, Kazakhstan FMA reporting interface, and the applicant’s specific custody and execution architecture.
- Skipping pre-application engagement. AFSA describes pre-application engagement as a “general recommendation rather than an option”: applicants who skip it routinely face longer review cycles and additional rounds of information requests. The pre-application phase is also where AFSA flags activity-head selection issues that, if caught late, force re-submission of the regulatory business plan.
- Not running formation and AFSA application in parallel. AIFC entity formation through the Registrar of Companies and AFSA authorisation are separate workstreams that can run in parallel. Applicants who treat them sequentially add four to six weeks to the overall timeline unnecessarily.
- Underweighting the technology audit. The mandatory third-party technology audit takes four to eight weeks and must be complete before Authorisation In Principle. Applicants who commission it after Stage 4 information requests have already started add unnecessary time to the AIP phase.
- Treating Russian-origin Controller screening as an afterthought. Kazakhstan is not under OFAC sanctions, but USD and EUR correspondent banks screen Russian-passport beneficial owners with deeper diligence. Source-of-funds dossier preparation, pre-qualified bank introductions, and a clear answer to the Controller-residency question should be set at the start of Stage 1, not at the banking stage.
Frequently Asked Questions
An AIFC Digital Asset Service Provider (DASP) licence is an authorisation granted by the Astana Financial Services Authority (AFSA) permitting a legal entity registered in the Astana International Financial Centre (AIFC) to carry on one or more of ten regulated digital-asset activities. These include operating a digital-asset trading facility, dealing in or providing custody of digital assets, advising on or arranging deals in digital assets, and providing money services in relation to digital assets (including fiat-stablecoin issuance). The framework is governed by the AIFC Rules on Digital Asset Activities, in force since .
Yes. AFSA permits a single AIFC-incorporated entity to hold authorisations for several activity heads, subject to AFSA approval of the regulatory business plan, capital and substance arrangements for each. Multi-activity applications attract the highest single application fee plus 50% per additional activity. The combined capital requirement is the sum of activity-specific floors, and the substance requirement (CIGA on AIFC territory) applies across the consolidated entity.
No. AIFC DASP authorisations cover the ten regulated activity heads under the DAA, which are predominantly market-facing services. Mining and validation activity falls under Kazakhstan’s mainland regime and Astana Hub framework, supervised by different authorities. AIFC DASPs that wish to mine for their own account or operate validation infrastructure need separate consideration of mainland licensing requirements.
Not through the crypto regimes. Security tokens and tokenised real-world assets run through a separate AIFC pathway: the AIFC Security Token Offering (STO) Framework, in force since , one of the earliest dedicated STO regimes globally, which governs the issuance and trading of security tokens inside the AIFC and is supervised by AFSA. It is distinct from both an AIFC DASP licence and Kazakhstan’s national Law on Digital Assets (in force ), which covers non-security crypto such as exchanges and mining. A national crypto authorisation does not cover security tokens. Where the token is a fund interest rather than a standalone instrument, see our fund licensing guidance, where the vehicle stays under the fund regime.
The fastest realistic timeline for a well-prepared single-activity DASP authorisation is approximately four months from initial AFSA engagement to licence grant. DATFs and multi-activity packages routinely run six to twelve months because the third-party technology audit, capital deposit, and Approved Individual approval cycle take longer in proportion to scope. The AIFC’s FinTech Lab on-ramp adds six to eighteen months between FinTech Lab entry and full-regime migration, but reduces capital and fee burden during testing and is the recommended route for novel models.
The FinTech Lab is AFSA’s structured on-ramp for early-stage or novel-model DASPs. Nineteen of the 29 currently authorised DASPs began in FinTech Lab and migrated to the full regime. Application and supervision fees are reduced, capital requirements are scaled to the testing phase, and AFSA provides closer supervisory engagement. The FinTech Lab is the recommended route for first-time AFSA applicants, novel business models, and operators who want to validate technology and operational design under regulatory supervision before committing to full-regime capital deployment.
AIFC entity formation, signing-of-documents and key Controller interactions typically require at least one in-person visit to Astana, although several stages of the AFSA application run remotely through the Self-Service Portal. Senior management (the SEO, Compliance Officer and MLRO at minimum) are expected to be present on AIFC territory once the firm commences regulated activity, in line with the Substantial Presence Rules and substance requirements.
Minimum capital ranges from USD 10,000 for Advising on Investments, Arranging Deals and Arranging Custody, through USD 50,000 for Dealing as Agent, USD 100,000 for Managing Investments, USD 200,000 for DATFs and Providing Money Services (including fiat-stablecoin issuance), to USD 250,000 for Providing Custody and Dealing as Principal. Multi-activity applications combine the activity-specific floors. Every DASP must additionally maintain liquid assets of at least 25% of annual operating expenditure under the Expenditure-Based Capital Minimum.
Plan for USD 90,000–180,000 in Year 1 for a single-activity DASP authorisation, of which AFSA regulatory fees are typically USD 6,000–30,000 and the balance comprises legal advisory, compliance documentation, third-party technology audit, AIFC entity formation, and substance setup. Annual ongoing run-rate (Year 2 onwards) typically runs USD 50,000–120,000. DATF authorisations and multi-activity packages run at the upper end of these ranges; simple advisory authorisations run at the lower end. Capital deposit (USD 10,000–250,000+) is locked rather than spent.
No. Kazakhstan is a member of the Eurasian Group on Combating Money Laundering and Financing of Terrorism (EAG), a FATF-style regional body, and is not on the FATF list of “Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring” (grey list) or “High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action” (black list) as of . The AIFC has additionally received international recognition through the IOSCO Thematic Review of , which identified AIFC as one of four jurisdictions globally fully implementing all ten priority crypto-asset and digital-asset recommendations.
Yes. The AIFC and the National Bank of Kazakhstan formalised cooperation between AIFC-licensed exchanges and Kazakhstan second-tier banks in , building on a 2022 pilot. AIFC DASPs can open KZT, USD and EUR accounts with cooperating second-tier banks; international correspondent access depends on each institution’s risk appetite. Onboarding typically takes 30–90 days. Russian-origin Controllers face deeper diligence at the international bank layer; pre-qualified introductions and source-of-funds dossier preparation reduce both onboarding time and rejection rate.
An AIFC DASP licence does not grant EU market access or passporting rights. MiCA contains no third-country equivalence regime for digital-asset service providers as of . MiCA Article 61 permits third-country firms to serve EU clients only when the client initiates contact entirely on their own initiative, and ESMA’s guidelines interpret this exemption narrowly: any EU-targeted marketing, EU-language content, or geo-targeted advertising voids the exemption. Operators seeking systematic EU market access should obtain a separate CASP authorisation in an EU member state. See the Jagelski & Partners guide to reverse solicitation under MiCA for full detail.
AIFC DASPs file audited annual financial statements within four months of financial year-end, quarterly prudential returns demonstrating ongoing capital and EBCM compliance, an annual AML/CFT return covering customer-due-diligence statistics and STR/SAR volumes, an annual Risk Mitigation Programme update to AFSA, and an annual refresh of the mandatory third-party technology audit. STRs and SARs are filed to the Kazakhstan Financial Monitoring Agency under the mainland AML law. Material changes (Controllers, senior management, business plan, new activities) require AFSA notification or pre-approval.
Yes. The AIFC AML/CFT/Sanctions Rules Amendment No. 7 () embeds Travel Rule obligations in the AIFC perimeter, and AFSA is among the regulators referenced in the FATF Best Practices on Travel Rule Supervision of . AIFC DASPs must collect, transmit and verify originator and beneficiary information on virtual-asset transfers in line with FATF Recommendation 16, subject to the threshold and counterparty conditions set out in the AIFC AML Rules.
Start Your AIFC DASP Application
Jagelski & Partners coordinates AIFC formation, AFSA authorisation, banking introductions and ongoing compliance for crypto, fintech and high-risk operators routing through Astana. Speak to us at scoping, not at submission.
Not ready to book? Ask Emma first. She answers now, and if it needs a human she takes your details so the consultation starts ahead.
References
Show all references
- Astana Financial Services Authority, AIFC Rules on Digital Asset Activities (DAA) v2, AIFC Rules No. FR00062 of 2023 (consolidated 1 January 2025), aifc.kz, accessed .
- International Organization of Securities Commissions, Thematic Review on Implementation of the Recommendations on Crypto and Digital Asset Markets (FR/13/25), October 2025, iosco.org, accessed .
- Astana International Financial Centre, AIFC Recognised Among Global Leaders in Implementing IOSCO Digital Asset Standards, October 2025, afsa.aifc.kz, accessed .
- Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (Dubai), Company Rulebook Part VI.B.1: Capital Requirements, rulebooks.vara.ae, accessed .
- Astana Financial Services Authority, Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility, Capital Requirements, afsa.aifc.kz, accessed .
- Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (Dubai), Exchange Services Rulebook, rulebooks.vara.ae, accessed .
- Astana International Financial Centre, Rules and Mechanisms of Cooperation Between AIFC Participants Carrying Out Digital Asset Activities and Second-Tier Banks, January 2024.
- Astana Financial Services Authority, AFSA 2025 Annual Report: Regulatory Developments and Supervisory Outcomes, aifc.kz, accessed .
- Astana International Financial Centre, Tax Regime in AIFC, aifc.kz, accessed .
- Republic of Kazakhstan, Constitutional Statute on the Astana International Financial Centre No. 438-V (7 December 2015, consolidated text), aifc.kz, accessed .
- Astana Financial Services Authority, About AFSA, afsa.aifc.kz, accessed .
- Astana Financial Services Authority, AFSA Introduces Amendments to Capital Market, Digital Assets and Crowdfunding Frameworks in the AIFC, December 2025, afsa.aifc.kz, accessed .
- Astana Financial Services Authority, AFSA Announces New Rulebook on Digital Asset Activities, September 2023, afsa.aifc.kz, accessed .
- Astana Financial Services Authority, AFSA Fines Proportunity Management Company Limited and ACLB Management Company Limited; AIFC Court Compulsory Winding-Up Petition, 21 January 2026, afsa.aifc.kz, accessed .
- Astana International Financial Centre, AFSA Introduces Amendments to the AIFC Fees Rules, November 2025 (effective 1 December 2025), aifc.kz, accessed .
- Financial Action Task Force, Best Practices on Travel Rule Supervision, June 2025, fatf-gafi.org, accessed .
- Astana Financial Services Authority Online Rulebook, Rules Applicable to Digital Asset Service Providers, orderly.myafsa.com, accessed .
- Astana International Financial Centre, Rules on the Substantial Presence of AIFC Participants Applying Tax Exemptions, afsa.aifc.kz, accessed .
- Astana Financial Services Authority, General Rules: Authorisation and Approved Individuals, afsa.aifc.kz, accessed .
- Astana Financial Services Authority, Licensing at AIFC: How to Obtain an AFSA Permit, aifc.kz, accessed .
- Astana International Financial Centre, AFSA Adopts Comprehensive Framework on Providing Money Services, October 2025, aifc.kz, accessed .
- Republic of Kazakhstan State Revenue Committee, Conventions for the Avoidance of Double Taxation, kgd.gov.kz, accessed .
- Financial Action Task Force, Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring and High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action, current list, fatf-gafi.org, accessed .