Why Choose Kazakhstan for Company Formation?
Kazakhstan is unusual: the answer to “why form here” is really “why form in the AIFC”. The Astana International Financial Centre is a separate common-law jurisdiction carved out inside the country, with English-law company rules, its own registrar and regulator, US-dollar denomination, and a 0% tax regime on qualifying financial-services income until 2066.[1][7] For a crypto or fintech operator that distinction is decisive, because crypto is effectively legal in Kazakhstan only through the AIFC. The centre reached 4,954 participant companies from 91 countries at the end of 2025.[2]
An English-Law Jurisdiction Inside Kazakhstan
The AIFC was established by Constitutional Statute No. 438-V of and operates under the AIFC Companies Regulations 2017, which commenced on 1 January 2018.[1][3] It has its own Registrar of Companies within the Astana Financial Services Authority (AFSA), its own court and international arbitration centre applying English common law, and an exemption from Kazakhstan’s currency-control regime so that participants may contract in any currency.[4] An AIFC company is therefore governed by AIFC Acts in English, not by mainland Kazakh corporate law, even though it sits geographically in Astana. This is the structural fact that everything else on this page follows from.
A 0% Rate to 2066 That Depends on Substance
An AIFC participant pays 0% corporate income tax on qualifying AIFC financial-services income until 1 January 2066, with qualifying financial services also exempt from VAT and foreign employees on 0% individual income tax over the same period.[5][6] The exemption is conditional, not automatic: it is gated by the AIFC Substantial Presence Rules, set out in full in the Taxation section.[7] Non-qualifying income, and intellectual-property income, fall back to mainland rates.
Clean FATF and EU Standing
Kazakhstan is on no FATF grey or black list, on no EU AML high-risk list, and on no EU list of non-cooperative tax jurisdictions.[8][9] It was removed from Eurasian Group enhanced monitoring in 2023 following its mutual evaluation. Clean list status supports correspondent banking, but it does not remove the crypto-specific scrutiny that banks apply to digital-asset-facing AIFC entities, which is covered honestly in the Banking section. The route from an AIFC company to an AFSA digital-asset authorisation is direct, and the Kazakhstan crypto licensing routes build on the same entity covered here.
Entity Types Under AIFC and Mainland Law
Kazakhstan offers two distinct formation environments, and choosing between them is the first real decision. The AIFC, under the Companies Regulations 2017, offers an English-law menu of vehicles; the mainland, under the Civil and Entrepreneurial Codes, offers the familiar Kazakh corporate forms.[1][10] For crypto, fintech and high-risk operators the AIFC Private Company is the standard vehicle, because it is the prerequisite entity for any AFSA licence and crypto is effectively prohibited on the mainland. The mainland LLP (TOO) is the alternative for a domestic-market business.
Definition: AIFC Private Company
An AIFC Private Company is a limited-liability company incorporated under the AIFC Companies Regulations 2017 rather than mainland Kazakh law. It permits 100% foreign ownership, carries no minimum capital, needs only one natural-person director with no residency requirement, need not appoint a company secretary, and is denominated in US dollars under English-law governance. It is the standard entity for crypto and fintech operators and the base from which an AFSA digital-asset licence is pursued. Its shares cannot be offered to the public, which distinguishes it from the AIFC Public Company.
| Entity | Min. Capital | Directors | Online Registration | Used For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIFC Private Company | None | 1 (natural person; no residency) | Yes | Standard crypto, fintech and high-risk operating vehicle; prerequisite for an AFSA licence |
| AIFC Public Company | USD 100,000 | 1+ | Yes | Rare; vehicles intended to offer shares to the public |
| AIFC Special Purpose Company (SPC) | None | 1 (corporate director allowed; no AIFC office required) | Yes | Securitisation and structured-finance “exempt activities” only |
| AIFC Restricted Scope Company | None | 1+ | Yes | Family offices and professional investors; greater confidentiality |
| Mainland LLP (TOO) | None for small business; 100 MCI for medium/large | 1 (foreigner allowed) | Partial (via IIN / power of attorney) | Domestic-market operating business; crypto effectively prohibited |
Formation Process
An AIFC Private Company is registered with the AIFC Registrar of Companies, fully online through the digitalresident.kz self-service portal, in English.[4][11] Registration runs 5–20 working days, commonly about two weeks, with AFSA guidance citing processing of up to 10 days for a complete file. The longer part of becoming operational is banking, and obtaining an Individual Identification Number (IIN) for a foreign director, both of which run in parallel with registration.
What You Need to Prepare
Foreign-issued documents filed for AIFC registration do not require an apostille or a notarised translation; they are submitted in English.[11] This is a genuine advantage over the mainland and over jurisdictions that demand consular legalisation. Gather the following before filing.
| Document / Item | Details | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Passport copy (each shareholder and director) | Clear colour copy, in English | No apostille or translation required for AIFC filings |
| Proof of residential address | Utility bill or bank statement | Submitted in English |
| Company name (pre-checked) | One or more options; no restricted terms | Reserved with the Registrar for 30 days |
| Articles of Association | Standard template, or bespoke with an external legal opinion | Filed through the Registrar |
| Intended activity | Must match real operations and any planned AFSA licence | Mismatch is a common bank-onboarding failure point |
| Shareholder and UBO structure | Ownership percentages, ultimate beneficial owners | UBO information filed with the application (Part 14-1, Companies Regulations)[12] |
| Source-of-funds evidence | Bank references, contracts, financial model | Increasingly requested at incorporation and by banks |
| Registered office in the AIFC | Physical AIFC address; virtual or serviced office permitted | Mandatory; AIFC-zoned business centres available |
| IIN for a foreign director / CEO | Individual Identification Number via the Expat Centre | Required for a foreign director to act |
Reserve the Name
Reserve the company name with the AIFC Registrar of Companies. The reservation holds for 30 days. Confirm the intended activity, because it must align with the company’s real operations and any planned AFSA licence, and is what a bank later scrutinises.
Prepare the Articles of Association
Adopt the standard Articles template or prepare bespoke Articles, which require an external legal opinion. Settle the shareholder and director structure and the ultimate-beneficial-owner information that will accompany the application.
File via the Self-Service Portal
Submit the application through digitalresident.kz with the Articles, passports and UBO information, in English. No apostille or translation is required. An invoice for the USD 300 registration fee is generated online.
Pay the Registration Fee
Pay the USD 300 registration fee for a Private Company. The Registrar then begins its review of the application and supporting documents.
Certificate of Incorporation
On approval the Registrar issues the Certificate of Incorporation showing the company name, its Business Identification Number (BIN) and the date of incorporation. At this point the company has legal personality, but cannot conduct AFSA-regulated activity without the relevant licence.
IIN, Office and Bank Account
Obtain an IIN for the foreign director through the AIFC Expat Centre, confirm the AIFC registered office, and open a corporate bank account. Banking is the practical bottleneck rather than a formality, and is covered in detail in the Banking section. Substance evidence and a clear business model materially shorten the timeline.
Special Programmes
Beyond the bare registration, the AIFC offers several genuine differentiators that matter to an internationally owned operator. None of them is a residency or citizenship route, and the special visa regime grants neither tax residency nor citizenship, but together they make remote setup and English-law operation realistic.[13]
| Programme | What it grants | What it does NOT grant |
|---|---|---|
| AIFC Expat Centre | IIN, work permits, visas and electronic digital signatures for participants and staff, through a single contact point | Tax residency; an AFSA licence |
| Special visa regime | Entry for participant employees and family for up to five years with no separate work permit | Citizenship; permanent residence |
| Remote incorporation (digitalresident.kz) | Full registration with no physical presence required | A registered office (still required in the AIFC, virtual permitted) |
| AIFC Court & arbitration centre | English-law dispute resolution with a strong enforcement record | A formation step; it is a governance selling point |
Currency-regime exemption. AIFC participants are exempt from Kazakhstan’s currency-control registration and notification requirements and may contract in any currency, which is why the AIFC is a USD-denominated environment in practice.[4] For a regulated digital-asset business the AIFC also runs a FinTech Lab regulatory sandbox, which lets a firm test solutions before full authorisation. The sandbox is a licensing-stage instrument rather than a formation step, so it is covered on the Kazakhstan crypto licensing page.
What these programmes do not do. The special visa regime is an entry facility, not a residence permit, and it does not make the holder Kazakhstan tax-resident; tax residency is a separate determination. Forming an AIFC company is also not, by itself, a relocation: founders who continue to spend most of the year elsewhere usually remain tax-resident there. The programmes lower the operational friction of running an AIFC company remotely; they do not change where the founder is taxed personally.
Requirements
AIFC formation requirements are light on paper and unusually friendly on documents, because filings are in English with no apostille.[11] The two make-or-break elements are the activity-to-licence match and, for any company that wants the 0% rate, genuine AIFC-based substance under the Substantial Presence Rules.[7] A registered office physically in the AIFC is mandatory, though a virtual or serviced office satisfies it.
| Requirement | Standard AIFC Private Company | For an AFSA Digital-Asset Licence |
|---|---|---|
| Min. Directors | 1 (natural person) | 1+ with fit-and-proper assessment |
| Resident Director | Not required | Genuine local management and substance expected |
| Foreign Ownership | 100% | 100% |
| Min. Share Capital | None | Capital adequacy set by AFSA (see Licensing Pathways) |
| Registered Office | Physical AIFC address; virtual or serviced permitted | Genuine AIFC office expected for substance |
| Company Secretary | Not required | Compliance and MLRO functions required |
| UBO Disclosure | Yes, to the AIFC Registrar | Yes, plus regulator scrutiny |
| Nominee Directors / Shareholders | UBO must be disclosed | Not accepted in practice |
| Annual Filing | Annual return; tax filings | Annual return; audited accounts; regulatory returns |
Registered Office and Substance
Every AIFC company needs a registered office physically in the AIFC; a virtual or serviced office satisfies the requirement, and offices are available in AIFC-zoned business centres in Astana. A virtual office alone, however, is thin substance: a virtual address gets you incorporated, but it does not, on its own, secure either the 0% rate or a bank account, because a bank assessing a crypto-facing company tests for a real office and accountable officers. The substance conditions that gate the 0% exemption are set out in full in the Taxation section.
UBO Disclosure and Beneficial Ownership
AIFC companies must maintain beneficial-ownership information for relevant persons under Part 14-1 of the Companies Regulations, and Kazakhstan operates a UBO reporting regime under its AML law.[12] The information is filed with the AIFC Registrar and is not a public open register of the EU kind. Nominee arrangements that obscure the true UBO are not consistent with these obligations and are not accepted by banks during onboarding, where source-of-funds checks are designed to identify the real owner.
Costs and Pricing
The AIFC has the lowest headline government formation fee in the financial-centre cluster: USD 300 for a Private Company. The figure that misleads buyers is exactly that headline, which excludes the registered office, the service-provider or agent fee, accounting setup and the IIN process that make a company operational. AIFC fees are denominated in US dollars, which removes the conversion guesswork. The schedule below is current as of and read from the AIFC Fees Rules; confirm the live schedule before relying on any figure, as fee versions update without notice.[14]
Government and Registry Fees
| Fee Item | Amount | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| AIFC registration (Private / Public Company) | USD 300 | Online application; the headline government fee |
| Registration (certain other forms, e.g. Recognised Company) | USD 500 online / USD 1,500 paper | Branch and recognised-entity registrations |
| Annual return / confirmation filing fee | Modest (Schedule 5-2, from 1 January 2023) | No separate annual government renewal fee for a private-company registration currently |
| Post-registration change (e.g. share-capital change) | USD 100 per notice | Duty on filed changes |
| Late filing of the annual return | USD 50 after 5 business days | Plus further penalties and a strike-off path |
| Transfer of incorporation (re-domiciliation in / out) | USD 3,000 | Application fee |
| Registered office / shared desk | Market-rate lease; virtual office available | Mandatory AIFC address |
| Accounting / audit | Audit only if turnover > USD 5,000,000 | IFRS accounting throughout |
Total Cost Summary
| Cost Component | All-in cost (USD) |
|---|---|
| AIFC registration fee | USD 300 |
| Registered office (virtual to serviced) | USD 1,500–6,000 |
| Formation assistance / agent | USD 2,000–5,000 |
| IIN, EDS and director setup | USD 300–1,000 |
| Accounting setup and first-year bookkeeping | USD 1,500–4,000 |
| Total Year 1 (non-licensed) | USD 5,000–15,000+ |
| Annual Ongoing (Year 2+) | USD 3,000–8,000 (office + accounting; audit if > USD 5m turnover) |
The mainland LLP is cheaper on paper: state registration is 6.5 MCI≈ USD 50 and is levied only on large business, so small and medium founders are effectively exempt, with the real cost sitting in accounting, an electronic digital signature and a legal address. But the mainland is not the vehicle for licensed crypto, so for the audience of this page the AIFC figures above are the relevant ones.
Taxation
Tax is the reason most operators look at the AIFC. An AIFC participant pays 0% corporate income tax on qualifying AIFC financial-services income until 1 January 2066, under the Constitutional Statute, with qualifying financial services exempt from VAT and foreign employees on 0% individual income tax over the same horizon.[5][6] Non-qualifying income, and intellectual-property income, are taxed at mainland rates, which changed materially under the new Tax Code in force from 1 January 2026.[15]
| Tax Type | Rate | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| CIT on qualifying AIFC income | 0% to 2066 | Qualifying financial services in Schedule 1; conditional on the Substantial Presence Rules[5][7] |
| VAT on qualifying AIFC financial services | Exempt | Exemption tied to qualifying-income status[6] |
| Individual income tax (foreign AIFC staff) | 0% to 2066 | For foreign employees of AIFC participants[6] |
| Mainland CIT (non-qualifying / mainland income) | 20% | 25% for banks and gambling from 2026; IP income not exempt[15] |
| Mainland VAT (from 1 January 2026) | 16% | Up from 12%; registration threshold lowered to 10,000 MCI[15] |
| WHT on dividends to non-residents | 5% / 15% | 5% up to 230,000 MCI, 15% above; treaty relief available[16] |
| WHT on interest | 10% | Reduced from 15% under the 2026 Tax Code[15] |
| Investment income on AIX-listed and participant shares | Exempt to 2066 | Capital gains and dividends, individuals and legal entities[6] |
Substance to Keep Your 0%
The 0% rate is the headline attraction, and it is conditional. There is no offshore-style economic-substance return in the AIFC, but the AIFC Rules on the Substantial Presence of AIFC Participants are the functional equivalent, tying the exemption, rather than the right to exist, to genuine activity.[7] A participant is “substantially present” only if it simultaneously meets three conditions: it carries out its core income-generating activity on AIFC territory; it incurs operating expenses adequate for that activity; and it employs a number of qualified full-time staff adequate for it. Outsourcing the core activity outside Kazakhstan is not allowed, and intellectual-property income (royalties, IP capital gains and IP sale) is excluded from the exemption.
Two features make this regime distinct. There are no fixed numeric thresholds for staff, expenditure or office space: adequacy is judged by the state revenue authority during a tax audit, benchmarked against similar businesses, and the participant must lodge an economic study of the project justifying its costs and headcount.[7] A participant that fails the test does not merely lose a deduction; the ordinary Tax Code applies and the 0% exemption is lost. This is the practitioner reality behind the marketing: the rate is earned through real AIFC presence, not granted by an address.
CRS, CARF and DAC8-Equivalent Reporting
Kazakhstan is a full Common Reporting Standard participant and has committed to the OECD Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework, with first exchanges under both expected in 2027.[17] A digital-asset business operating from the AIFC should plan for CARF due-diligence and reporting obligations on reportable users from that horizon, on the same timetable that EU operators face under DAC8. As of the implementing detail is being finalised, so 2027 is the planning horizon for crypto-asset reporting readiness.
Pillar Two (Global Minimum Tax)
Kazakhstan has not enacted a domestic Pillar Two or qualified minimum top-up tax regime as of mid-2026, so the AIFC 0% regime is intact domestically; this is the single most consequential tax-policy variable for the page and is worth monitoring.[18] The tension point is external: an AIFC company that is part of a multinational group with consolidated annual revenue of at least EUR 750,000,000 could face top-up tax in a parent jurisdiction under the income-inclusion rule, or under the undertaxed-profits rule elsewhere, because the AIFC’s 0% effective rate is below the 15% global minimum. For the typical owner-managed crypto or fintech startup below that threshold, Pillar Two does not bite.
Banking
Banking is the hardest part of operating a Kazakhstan crypto or fintech company, and it is harder than incorporation by a wide margin. The company forms in weeks; the operating account can take weeks to months. Difficulty is highest for non-resident-owned companies and businesses in crypto and higher-risk verticals. This is the single factor most worth planning for before you incorporate, and clean AIFC incorporation does not remove it.
Two institution archetypes serve this market in practice. The first is a Kazakhstan second-tier (domestic) bank that has built an AIFC-facing or digital-asset-cooperation desk; these exist because AFSA rules on cooperation between digital-asset service providers and second-tier banks create the fiat on and off-ramp channel, and onboarding through them is document-heavy and slow. The second is a regional or EMI-type institution in a friendlier jurisdiction, used for operational flows while the AIFC entity holds the licence. Onboarding runs about two to four weeks for a clean non-licensed company, and two to three months where crypto or higher-risk compliance flags arise.
Documentation is consistent across institutions: the certificate of incorporation and Articles, shareholder and director identification, UBO and source-of-funds evidence, a business plan or financial model, and a governance and AML or KYC framework. Substance materially affects bankability, because banks test for a real office, accountable officers and traceable flows. Kazakhstan’s clean FATF and EU standing supports correspondent banking, but crypto-specific de-risking remains the practical bottleneck, so crypto firms typically combine a licensed Kazakhstan banking relationship for fiat ramps with offshore EMI or payment rails for operations.
Jagelski & Partners’ banking partner network spans more than 90 banking and EMI institutions, through which businesses placed more than fourteen billion euros in client turnover across banking and EMI relationships in 2025. Jagelski & Partners is paid by the institution, not by the client, and there is no onboarding fee. For an AIFC company, securing banking is the critical next step after formation; the banking service pre-qualifies the business across the network before any application is made.
Annual Compliance
Every AIFC company carries ongoing obligations, and non-compliance carries real consequences: financial penalties and, ultimately, strike-off. The obligations are lighter than a typical EU regime, but the annual return is mandatory even for a dormant company, and the substance evidence needed to hold the 0% rate is a recurring discipline rather than a one-off.
Annual Filing and Audit Obligations
An AIFC company must file an annual return with the Registrar within six months after its financial-year end, and this is mandatory including for dormant companies.[19] A company with turnover of USD 500,000 or less and 20 or fewer shareholders on average may file an annual confirmation statement instead. Accounting follows IFRS, and a statutory audit is required only where annual turnover exceeds USD 5,000,000. Mainland obligations differ: annual financial statements, a corporate-income-tax return by 31 March, and filings to the State Revenue Committee.
UBO and Substance Maintenance
Beneficial-ownership information for relevant persons must be kept current under Part 14-1 of the Companies Regulations, and Kazakhstan operates a UBO reporting regime under its AML law.[12] For a participant claiming the 0% exemption, the recurring discipline is substance: maintaining the AIFC-based core activity, adequate staff and expenditure, and the economic study that the Substantial Presence Rules require, all of which can be tested in a tax audit.[7]
Penalties for Non-Compliance
Late filing of the annual return carries a USD 50 late fee after five business days, with further penalties and a strike-off path for persistent non-compliance.[14] A struck-off company loses legal personality, and its directors can face difficulty forming again. Losing the Substantial Presence test does not strike the company off, but it applies the ordinary Tax Code and removes the 0% exemption. Penalty amounts are current as of .
Licensing Pathways from an AIFC Company
An AIFC company should be structured with its intended AFSA licence in mind, because capital, governance and substance requirements differ sharply by activity. The AIFC-registered entity is the prerequisite vehicle for any AFSA authorisation.[20] The cards below map the main routes. Full detail lives on the dedicated licensing page.
AFSA Digital-Asset Licensing
AFSA authorises operating a digital-asset trading facility, custody, dealing, managing investments, advising and digital-asset money services, plus FinTech Lab sandbox testing. Capital and substance set by AFSA.
VASP, CASP and MiCA Overview
How AFSA digital-asset authorisation compares with EU CASP authorisation under MiCA, and which route fits a given market.
An AIFC entity confers no EU passporting rights, and MiCA contains no third-country equivalence regime. MiCA Article 61 permits a third-country firm to serve EU clients only where the client initiates the contact entirely on its own initiative. ESMA’s guidelines, applicable from , interpret this restrictively: any EU-targeted marketing, EU-language promotion, geo-targeted advertising or use of EU-based influencers is solicitation that voids the exemption. For full detail on what constitutes solicitation and the documentation requirements, see Reverse Solicitation Under MiCA.
Advantages and Limitations
The AIFC offers an English-law, USD-denominated base with a long-horizon 0% rate and the only real route to licensed crypto in Kazakhstan, traded against banking friction, a substance condition on the exemption, weaker brand recognition than DIFC or ADGM, and no access to the European market. The honest picture is that the AIFC rewards operators who commit to genuine local presence and disappoints those treating it as a paper address.
- 0% corporate tax to 2066 on qualifying income. The longest tax-exemption horizon in the financial-centre cluster, plus VAT exemption and 0% income tax for foreign staff.
- English-law jurisdiction inside Kazakhstan. Its own registrar, regulator, court and arbitration centre under common law, with USD denomination.
- 100% foreign ownership, no resident director. One natural-person director and one shareholder, with no residency requirement.
- Lowest headline formation fee in the cluster. USD 300 registration, with fully remote filing via digitalresident.kz.
- No apostille for AIFC filings. Foreign documents are submitted in English with no legalisation or translation.
- Clean FATF and EU standing. On no FATF, EU AML or EU non-cooperative-tax list, and the prerequisite vehicle for an AFSA digital-asset licence.
- Banking is difficult for non-resident and crypto profiles. Onboarding runs weeks to months. Mitigation: pre-qualify the business across the banking network before incorporation, and build demonstrable AIFC substance.
- The 0% rate is conditional, not automatic. It depends on the Substantial Presence Rules: AIFC-based core activity, adequate staff and expenditure, no offshoring. Mitigation: build genuine AIFC presence and the economic-study evidence from the outset.
- No EU passporting or MiCA access. An AIFC company cannot serve EU crypto clients systematically. Mitigation: operators targeting EU clients can obtain a separate CASP authorisation in an EU member state, or, for isolated genuinely unsolicited contacts only, may fall within the narrow reverse-solicitation exemption under MiCA Article 61.
- Weaker brand recognition than DIFC or ADGM. Counterparties may know the Gulf centres better. Mitigation: lead with the AIFC’s English-law framework, court enforcement record and clean list status when introducing the structure.
- Crypto is effectively confined to the AIFC. The mainland is not a route for licensed digital-asset activity. Mitigation: use the AIFC Private Company, not a mainland LLP, for any crypto-facing plan.
- Pillar Two exposure for large groups. A group above EUR 750m faces top-up tax abroad on the 0% rate. Mitigation: model the income-inclusion and undertaxed-profits rules where the AIFC entity sits in a large MNE group.
How the AIFC Compares
The AIFC’s real peers are the other low-tax financial-centre hubs, not the CIS or Central-Asia formation cluster. DIFC and ADGM in the Gulf are the closest comparators, each an English-law centre inside an onshore state with a 0% qualifying-income regime; Labuan is the established Asian low-tax centre; Singapore is included for institutional context. The comparison below positions the AIFC within that set.
| Factor | AIFC (Kazakhstan) | DIFC / ADGM (UAE) | Labuan | Singapore |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entity Type | AIFC Private Company | Private Company (Ltd) | Labuan company | Private Limited (Pte Ltd) |
| Timeline | 5–20 working days | 1–2 weeks | 1–2 weeks | 1–3 days |
| State / Reg Fee | USD 300 | ~USD 8,000 incorp (indicative) | USD 300–1,500 + USD 1,000/yr≈ USD 300–1,500 | ~USD 235 (ACRA) |
| Min. Capital | None | None (most; PLC USD 100,000) | 1 share, no minimum | SGD 1≈ USD 1 |
| Corporate Tax | 0% qualifying to 2066; else 20% | 0% qualifying; else 9% | 3% on trading profit (substance) | 17% (with exemptions) |
| EU Passporting | No | No | No | No |
| FATF Status | Clean | Clean | Clean | Clean |
| Remote Management | Yes (fully remote filing) | Yes (KYC and bank in person) | Yes (trust-company agent) | Limited (resident director required) |
| Crypto Banking | Difficult | Moderate–hard | Moderate–hard | Hard for crypto |
| Best For | English-law 0%-to-2066 base and an AFSA licence | Gulf English-law centre with brand depth | Low-cost Asian low-tax trading centre | APAC institutional credibility |
Compare every formation jurisdiction side by side →
The AIFC has the cheapest headline government formation fee in the cluster and the longest tax-exemption horizon, to 2066, but the highest banking friction and the weakest brand recognition against DIFC and ADGM. DIFC and ADGM offer the same English-law, 0%-qualifying model with stronger Gulf recognition at materially higher cost; Labuan is the low-cost Asian option but taxes trading profit at 3% with a hard substance floor; Singapore brings institutional depth at a 17% headline rate and a resident-director requirement. None of the cluster grants EU passporting or MiCA access.
When Kazakhstan Is the Right Choice
Choose the AIFC if you want an English-law, USD-denominated base with the longest 0% horizon in the cluster, you intend to pursue an AFSA digital-asset licence, you can commit to genuine AIFC substance, and your market is global rather than EU-resident. Consider alternatives if you need the strongest Gulf brand recognition (DIFC or ADGM), the lowest-cost Asian low-tax centre (Labuan), institutional banking depth from day one (Singapore), or systematic access to EU clients, which points to an EU CASP authorisation instead.
Not sure which column is you? Ask Emma. She compares these jurisdictions in seconds, in your language.
Frequently Asked Questions
Yes, for company and financial law. The Astana International Financial Centre is a separate common-law jurisdiction inside Kazakhstan, established by Constitutional Statute No. 438-V of 7 December 2015. It has its own English-law-based commercial framework, its own Registrar of Companies within the Astana Financial Services Authority (AFSA), its own regulator, its own court and arbitration centre, and a USD-denominated, currency-control-exempt regime. A company you form there is governed by AIFC Acts rather than by mainland Kazakh corporate law, even though it sits geographically in Astana. This separation is the defining structural feature of forming here.
The AIFC Private Company, a limited-liability company under the AIFC Companies Regulations 2017. It is the standard vehicle and the prerequisite legal entity for any AFSA digital-asset authorisation. It carries no minimum capital, allows 100% foreign ownership with no director or shareholder residency requirement, needs only one natural-person director, and is denominated in US dollars under English-law governance. The mainland Limited Liability Partnership (TOO) is the alternative for a domestic-market business, but crypto is effectively only legal in Kazakhstan through the AIFC, so the Private Company is the vehicle for the licensed-crypto audience.
Registration runs 5 to 20 working days, commonly about two weeks, with the AFSA post-registration guidance citing processing of up to 10 days for a complete and clean application. Name reservation holds for 30 days. The longer part of becoming operational is banking: a corporate account adds two to four weeks for a clean non-licensed company and two to three months where crypto or higher-risk flags arise. A foreign director also needs an Individual Identification Number (IIN) through the AIFC Expat Centre, which runs in parallel.
The AIFC registration fee for a Private Company is USD 300 on an online application. That is the headline government fee, not the real cost of getting operational. Once a registered office in the AIFC, a service-provider or agent fee, an accounting setup and the IIN process for a foreign director are added, a realistic all-in Year 1 figure for a non-licensed company runs from roughly USD 5,000 to USD 15,000 or more, driven mainly by office and advisory choices. Ongoing annual cost is the registered-office lease plus accounting, with audit only if turnover exceeds USD 5,000,000. AFSA licensing fees are separate and sit on the crypto licensing page.
Yes. An AIFC Private Company allows 100% foreign ownership with no local-partner requirement, and there is no residency requirement for the director or the shareholder. A single natural-person director and a single shareholder are sufficient, and both may be the same non-resident individual. This full-ownership position is one of the core reasons the AIFC Private Company, rather than a mainland vehicle, is the standard choice for an internationally owned crypto or fintech company.
No. AIFC formation is fully remote through the digitalresident.kz self-service portal: name reservation, Articles of Association, the application with UBO information, the USD 300 fee and the Certificate of Incorporation are all handled online. A registered office physically in the AIFC is required, but a virtual or serviced office satisfies this. A foreign CEO or director must obtain an IIN through the Expat Centre, which can be arranged without relocation. Banking is the step most likely to require a visit or a video identity check, depending on the institution.
No. Foreign-issued documents filed for AIFC registration do not require an apostille or a notarised translation. They are submitted in English, which is the working language of the AIFC. This is a genuine advantage over both mainland Kazakhstan, where documents must be apostilled and translated into Kazakh or Russian and notarised, and over jurisdictions such as the UAE that require full consular legalisation. Kazakhstan acceded to the Hague Apostille Convention in 2001, with electronic apostilles available since 2024, but for AIFC filings the apostille step does not apply.
An AIFC participant pays 0% corporate income tax on qualifying AIFC financial-services income until 1 January 2066, and qualifying financial services are exempt from VAT. Foreign employees of AIFC participants pay 0% individual income tax over the same period. Non-qualifying income, and intellectual-property income such as royalties and IP capital gains, are taxed at mainland rates, which from 1 January 2026 are 20% corporate income tax and 16% VAT under the new Tax Code. The participant must keep separate accounting of exempt and taxable income to hold the exemption.
It is conditional. The AIFC Rules on the Substantial Presence of AIFC Participants require a participant claiming the exemption to carry out its core income-generating activity on AIFC territory, to incur operating expenses adequate for that activity, and to employ a number of qualified full-time staff adequate for it. Outsourcing that core activity outside Kazakhstan is not allowed. There are no fixed numeric thresholds: adequacy is judged by the state revenue authority during a tax audit, benchmarked against similar businesses. A participant that fails the test loses the exemption and is taxed under the ordinary Tax Code.
Not in the offshore sense. There is no standalone economic-substance return, no statutory numeric employee or expenditure thresholds, and no classification of relevant activities of the Cayman or BVI kind. The functional equivalent is the AIFC Substantial Presence Rules, which condition the 0% tax exemption, rather than the right to exist, on genuine AIFC-based activity, adequate staff and expenditure, and a ban on offshoring the core activity. The test is qualitative and assessed by tax audit. The practical effect is the same: a paper-only AIFC company does not keep its 0% rate.
Kazakhstan’s new Tax Code took effect on 1 January 2026. Standard VAT rose from 12% to 16%, the base corporate income tax stayed at 20% with 25% for banks and gambling, dividend withholding to non-residents was restructured to 5% up to a threshold and 15% above it, and interest withholding fell to 10%. These mainland rates apply only to non-qualifying AIFC income. On Pillar Two, Kazakhstan has not implemented the OECD global minimum tax as of mid-2026, so the AIFC 0% regime is intact domestically. An AIFC company that is part of a multinational group with consolidated revenue of at least EUR 750,000,000 could face top-up tax in a parent jurisdiction, but owner-managed startups below that threshold are unaffected.
Banking is the hardest part. A non-resident-owned crypto or higher-risk AIFC company faces genuine friction opening an operating account, despite clean AIFC incorporation. Onboarding runs two to four weeks for a clean non-licensed company and two to three months where crypto compliance flags arise. The realistic stack pairs a Kazakhstan second-tier bank with an AIFC-facing or digital-asset desk for fiat ramps with EMI or payment rails in friendlier jurisdictions for operations, and substance materially affects bankability. On market access, an AIFC company confers no EU passporting and the AIFC regime gives no MiCA access. Operators targeting EU clients need a separate authorisation in an EU member state.
Form your AIFC company, banking-ready
Formation, substance, banking, and your AFSA licensing path, handled end-to-end with one point of contact. Book a free assessment and we'll map the route.
Not ready to book? Ask Emma first. She answers now, and if it needs a human she takes your details so the consultation starts ahead.
References
Show all references
- Republic of Kazakhstan, Constitutional Statute “On the Astana International Financial Centre” No. 438-V of 7 December 2015, adilet.zan.kz, accessed .
- Astana Financial Services Authority, AFSA 2025 Annual Report (4,954 AIFC Participants from 91 countries), afsa.aifc.kz, accessed .
- AIFC, AIFC Companies Regulations 2017 (AIFC Regulations No. 2 of 2017), full text, aifc.kz, accessed .
- AIFC, Legal Framework and Registrar of Companies (currency-regime exemption; AIFC Court and Arbitration Centre), orderly.myafsa.com, accessed .
- AIFC, Tax Benefits: 0% CIT on qualifying financial-services income to 2066, aifc.kz, accessed .
- AFSA, Financial Services Exempt from Corporate Tax (Schedule 1; VAT, IIT and investment-income exemptions), orderly.myafsa.com, accessed .
- AFSA, Rules on the Substantial Presence of AIFC Participants Applying Tax Exemptions for CIT and VAT (2020), orderly.myafsa.com, accessed .
- Financial Action Task Force, Black and Grey Lists (Kazakhstan not listed), fatf-gafi.org, accessed .
- Council of the European Union, EU List of Non-Cooperative Jurisdictions for Tax Purposes (Kazakhstan not listed), consilium.europa.eu, accessed .
- Republic of Kazakhstan, Civil Code, Entrepreneurial Code, Law on Limited Liability Partnerships and State Registration of Legal Entities, egov.kz, accessed .
- AIFC, Guidance on Registration and the digitalresident.kz Self-Service Portal (English filings, no apostille), digitalresident.kz, accessed .
- AIFC, AIFC Companies Regulations 2017, Part 14-1 (Beneficial Ownership of Relevant Persons), aifc.kz, accessed .
- AIFC, Expat Centre and Government Services (IIN, work permits, EDS, special visa regime), aifc.kz, accessed .
- AIFC, AFSA Fees Rules (v16, 18 October 2024), aifc.kz, accessed .
- Republic of Kazakhstan, New Tax Code (in force 1 January 2026): 16% VAT, 20%/25% CIT, restructured non-resident withholding, kgd.gov.kz, accessed .
- PwC, Kazakhstan: Corporate – Withholding Taxes (5% reduced dividend WHT up to 230,000 MCI; MLI in force since 1 October 2020), taxsummaries.pwc.com, accessed .
- OECD, Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF) Commitments (Kazakhstan; first exchanges 2027), oecd.org, accessed .
- PwC, Pillar Two / GloBE Country Tracker (no Kazakhstan enacting entry as of mid-2026), pwc.com, accessed .
- AFSA, Guidance on Annual Filing Obligations (annual return within 6 months; confirmation-statement alternative), December 2025, orderly.myafsa.com, accessed .
- AFSA, AIFC Rules on Digital Asset Activities (DASP authorisation; AIFC entity as prerequisite vehicle), orderly.myafsa.com, accessed .